Re: Hyperthreading in 6.x ... still frowned upon?
- From: Kris Kennaway <kris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 14:50:05 -0400
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 01:36:04PM -0400, Vinny Abello wrote:
An Intel technical rep that gave a presentation on upcoming Intel VT
technology in processors (Virtualization Technology) that I attended
indicated that Hyperthreading was really designed to start getting
programmers to program threading into their applications in
preparation of dual core processors that we now have.
That sounds like an interesting interpretation of history :-)
I typically disable Hyperthreading on all my servers as they are dual
processor or dual core/dual processor or better anyway. I tend to get
better results (with my applications) without Hyperthreading. I've
been experimenting with leaving it on with my workstation as it's not
a dual core or dual processor.
In my experience it's almost always a net loss too. One should
measure for oneself though.
Kris
Attachment:
pgpHWtjua1sCP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- Hyperthreading in 6.x ... still frowned upon?
- From: Marc G. Fournier
- Re: Hyperthreading in 6.x ... still frowned upon?
- From: Chuck Swiger
- Re: Hyperthreading in 6.x ... still frowned upon?
- From: Vinny Abello
- Hyperthreading in 6.x ... still frowned upon?
- Prev by Date: Re: 'camcontrol rescan all' does not find the attached tape drive
- Next by Date: Re: 6.1-RC panic: mutex Giant not owned at /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c:2037
- Previous by thread: Re: Hyperthreading in 6.x ... still frowned upon?
- Next by thread: Re: Hyperthreading in 6.x ... still frowned upon?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|