Re: iwi(4) in RELENG_6

On Tuesday 11 July 2006 14:35, Mark Andrews wrote:
On 7/10/06, Max Laier <max@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Monday 10 July 2006 16:40, Vlad GALU wrote:
Is the iwi driver going to be synced with rev. 1.3x of HEAD? I'm
using 1.36 along with a RELENG_6 tree, since it works better (read:
it works). From the HEAD commit messages I understand that some MFCs
would've been in order by now. Are there any show-stoppers that push
that schedule ahead ?

no. The only thing that bugs me a bit, is that the change will break
POLA

for

people using the old version. I have yet to hear from somebody using
that successfully, though.

I will get on MFCing it later today.

Thanks, Max!

Which of the iwi ports should be used now on RELENG6 now that
this has been MFC'd.

net/iwi-firmware-kmod or net/iwi-firmware?

net/iwi-firmware-kmod, but it needs to be updated to the new __FreeBSD_version
Right now it will tell you that you need iwi-firmware instead, which is
wrong.

--
/"\ Best regards, | mlaier@xxxxxxxxxxx
\ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661
X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet
/ \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News

Attachment: pgp3Y4Y40qDR5.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Relevant Pages

  • Re: [rfc] git: combo-blobs
    ... You'd dowload all the sha1 objects (they don't actually do anything to ... compare it to a full tree of the remove HEAD commit. ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • Re: iwi(4) in RELENG_6
    ... On Monday 10 July 2006 16:40, Vlad GALU wrote: ... using 1.36 along with a RELENG_6 tree, since it works better (read: ... From the HEAD commit messages I understand that some MFCs ... I will get on MFCing it later today. ...
    (freebsd-stable)