Re: Gateway
- From: "SigmaX asdf" <fydernix@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 03:38:41 -0400
I take it firewall_type="OPEN" does not include the divert rule?
The handbooks reads "The kernel source needs 'option divert' statement added
to the other IPFIREWALL statements compiled into a custom kernel." Is this
still the case in FreeBSD 6.1? Or am I covered by the IPDIVERT module or
something?
SigmaX
On 7/29/06, Igor Robul <igorr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
_______________________________________________
On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 01:42:41PM -0400, SigmaX asdf wrote:
> >^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >Should be natd_enable="YES"
>
>
> Heh; yeah, typo in my post. The file has it ok. Is there something I
have
> to do to specify the interfaces which have nat enabled? Does
natd_enable
> automatically forward any/every packet to any/every interface?
Personally I use ipfilter, but for ipfw/natd you need to specify
"divert" rule. You can find many examples, including ones in FreeBSD
handbook.
freebsd-stable@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: Gateway
- From: Rodrigo Galiano
- RE: Gateway
- References:
- Gateway
- From: SigmaX asdf
- Re: Gateway
- From: Igor Robul
- Re: Gateway
- From: SigmaX asdf
- Re: Gateway
- From: Igor Robul
- Gateway
- Prev by Date: Latest change of if_re.c breaks DNS resolution
- Next by Date: RE: Gateway
- Previous by thread: Re: Gateway
- Next by thread: RE: Gateway
- Index(es):