Re: tcp/udp performance
- From: Mohan Srinivasan <mohan_srinivasan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 11:42:02 -0700 (PDT)
Hi,
1) Have you made sure there are no NFS rexmits reported by nfsstat -c ?
2) I haven't run thruput tests lately, but when I tested NFS/UDP thruput a
few months ago, I routinely got over 70MB/s sequential read thruput
and over 80MB/s sequential write thruput (against filers). I used 32KB
blocksizes. -current improves upon this significantly, by about 25%-30%.
Send me private e-mail and we can discuss NFS client tunings.
mohan
--- Danny Braniss <danny@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
ever since 6.1 I've seen fluctuations in the performance of
the em (Intel(R) PRO/1000 Gigabit Ethernet).
motherboard OBN (On Board NIC)
---------------- ------------------
1- Intel SE7501WV2S Intel 82546EB::2.1
2- Intel SE7320VP2D2 INTEL 82541
3- Sun Fire X4100 Server Intel(R) PRO/1000
test 1: writing to a NetApp filer via NFS/UDP
FreeBSD Linux
MegaBytes/sec
1- Average: 18.48 32.61
2- Average: 15.69 35.72
3- Average: 16.61 29.69
(interstingly, doing NFS/TCP instead of NFS/UDP shows an increase in speed of
around 60% on FreeBSD but none on Linux)
test2: iperf using 1 as server:
FreeBSD(*) Linux
Mbits/sec
1- 926 905 (this machine was busy)
2- 545 798
3- 910 912
*: did a 'sysctl net.inet.tcp.sendspace=65536'
So, it seems to me something is not that good in the UDP department, but
I can't find what to tweek.
Any help?
danny
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- tcp/udp performance
- From: Danny Braniss
- tcp/udp performance
- Prev by Date: Re: 6.2 ETA
- Next by Date: Re: tcp/udp performance
- Previous by thread: Re: tcp/udp performance
- Next by thread: Re: tcp/udp performance
- Index(es):