Re: ARRRRGH! Guys, who's breaking -STABLE's GMIRROR code?!
- From: Vivek Khera <vivek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 09:59:02 -0400
On Sep 12, 2006, at 3:06 AM, Björn König wrote:
-STABLE is still a development branch without guarantee of a stable and working operating system. -STABLE guarantees that interfaces remain stable. If you want reliability then jump from release to release.
If you want reliability, then you need to do your own testing on your own hardware on your own application prior to replacing your working version with the new one. Never rely on anyone else saying "Yeah, it will work". It will come back and bite you where you don't want to be bit.
The other side of this is "don't replace what works" and just leave things as they are.
- Follow-Ups:
- cap_mkdb: illegal option -i. upgrade 5.4->6.1
- From: rvenne
- Re: ARRRRGH! Guys, who's breaking -STABLE's GMIRROR code?!
- From: Karl Denninger
- Re: ARRRRGH! Guys, who's breaking -STABLE's GMIRROR code?!
- From: Michael Butler
- cap_mkdb: illegal option -i. upgrade 5.4->6.1
- References:
- ARRRRGH! Guys, who's breaking -STABLE's GMIRROR code?!
- From: Karl Denninger
- Re: ARRRRGH! Guys, who's breaking -STABLE's GMIRROR code?!
- From: Björn König
- ARRRRGH! Guys, who's breaking -STABLE's GMIRROR code?!
- Prev by Date: Re: FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE ->FreeBSD 6.1-Stable
- Next by Date: Re: gjournal and Softupdates
- Previous by thread: Re: ARRRRGH! Guys, who's breaking -STABLE's GMIRROR code?!
- Next by thread: Re: ARRRRGH! Guys, who's breaking -STABLE's GMIRROR code?!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|