Re: ffs snapshot lockup
- From: Kris Kennaway <kris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 15:41:48 -0400
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 01:06:37PM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote:
On Oct 4, 2006, at 12:39 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
The only thing I think was running at the time would be a large file
copy from a remote system to this one using rsync.
As I understand, you got the panic. Then, you shall post the panic
message.
If you have core file, then running kgdb on the core may show
required
information.
(it shall be on the console exactly before en
and backtrace (using the bt command of ddb) of the paniced thread.
YOu can also do 'show msgbuf' from DDB.
i ran kgdb on the vmcore file. since the dump was generated by
calling doadump from DDB, the backtrace was showing the call stack of
that.
from what i read in the output from kgdb, it seems that something
locked the kernel and we broke to debugger from the watchdog timeout
(I enable software watchdog).
Hmm, be careful with that - if you set the timeout too low (and note
that for some workloads O(minutes) may even be too low) then you'll
get a lot of false positives.
Kris
Attachment:
pgprEiB84sFCV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ffs snapshot lockup
- From: Peter Holm
- Re: ffs snapshot lockup
- From: Vivek Khera
- Re: ffs snapshot lockup
- References:
- Re: ffs snapshot lockup
- From: Vivek Khera
- Re: ffs snapshot lockup
- From: Kostik Belousov
- Re: ffs snapshot lockup
- From: Vivek Khera
- Re: ffs snapshot lockup
- From: Kostik Belousov
- Re: ffs snapshot lockup
- From: Kris Kennaway
- Re: ffs snapshot lockup
- From: Vivek Khera
- Re: ffs snapshot lockup
- Prev by Date: Re: Re[2]: EV1 Servers makes me sick
- Next by Date: Re: ffs snapshot lockup
- Previous by thread: Re: ffs snapshot lockup
- Next by thread: Re: ffs snapshot lockup
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|