Re: 6.2 buildworld fails with NO_SHARED

Deep in the forest in the dark of night on Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 19:23
with a cackle and an evil grin Scot Hetzel cast another eye of
newt into the brew and chanted:

On 1/27/07, Bill Vermillion <bv@xxxxxxx> wrote:
No real problem there, but that brings up another question.
If - as documented in make.conf(5) - I put use the variable
NO_DYNAMIC_ROOT it says "set this is you do not want to link
/bin and /sbin dynamically".

Would that be the way to build statics in /bin and /sbin
instead of NO_SHARED.

I forgot about that option. Using NO_DYNAMIC_ROOT would be the proper
way to build /bin and /sbin statically, and still have the rest
compied dynamically.

Scot
--
DISCLAIMER:

No electrons were mamed while sending this message. Only
slightly bruised.

Thanks for confirming that - the NO_DYNAMIC_ROOT not 'no electonrs
were harmed :-)

Now - I wonder what should be done with the failures encountered
when NO_SHARED is used. I suspect it should be cleaned up, if for
no reason than to keep messages/queries such as mine from
shwoing up.

Thanks again.

Bill

--
Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"