Re: impossible rc.d ordering problem with stf and pf ?
- From: "Bruce M. Simpson" <bms@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 12:32:34 +0000
Pete French wrote:
Am trying to solve a little problem with 'pf'. I have a ruleset whichJust chiming in to confirm that this problem definitely exists.
has some firewall rules for the IPv6 interface stf0. This works fine,
except when I rreboot the machine, as the pf script is run before the
network_ipv6 script - so stf0 does not exist. but I cannot work out
how to arrange for stf0 to be created before the pf script is run - as
network_ipv6 requires 'routing', but the pf script says it must be run
before 'routing', if I am reading the 'REQUIRE' and 'BEFORE' lines
correctly.
I don't have a solution, however, my IPv6 tunnels at home have all expired, so I may well get spare cycles to look at this the same time that I get spare cycles to revive the tunnels.
BMS
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: impossible rc.d ordering problem with stf and pf ?
- From: Richard Coleman
- Re: impossible rc.d ordering problem with stf and pf ?
- References:
- impossible rc.d ordering problem with stf and pf ?
- From: Pete French
- impossible rc.d ordering problem with stf and pf ?
- Prev by Date: Re: rd.d/power_profile: dev.cpu.0.cx_supported doesn't exist
- Next by Date: Re: impossible rc.d ordering problem with stf and pf ?
- Previous by thread: Re: impossible rc.d ordering problem with stf and pf ?
- Next by thread: Re: impossible rc.d ordering problem with stf and pf ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|