Re: impossible rc.d ordering problem with stf and pf ?
- From: Volker <volker@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 13:58:43 +0100
On 12/23/-58 20:59, Pete French wrote:
Am trying to solve a little problem with 'pf'. I have a ruleset which
has some firewall rules for the IPv6 interface stf0. This works fine,
except when I rreboot the machine, as the pf script is run before the
network_ipv6 script - so stf0 does not exist. but I cannot work out
how to arrange for stf0 to be created before the pf script is run - as
network_ipv6 requires 'routing', but the pf script says it must be run
before 'routing', if I am reading the 'REQUIRE' and 'BEFORE' lines
correctly.
Pete,
I've played with that problems a few times. It's not a perfect
solution, but you may create your own pf loading script and place it
in /usr/local/etc/rc.d/. To make sure it's running late in startup,
use a proper # REQUIRE: line.
That way (and that what makes me saying it's not perfect) pf load
script /etc/rc.d/pf is being run but aborts loading pf rules in
first place and later (when rc is working though
/usr/local/etc/rc.d/) pf rules are loaded by your custom script.
HTH,
Volker
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: impossible rc.d ordering problem with stf and pf ?
- From: Alexey Karagodov
- Re: impossible rc.d ordering problem with stf and pf ?
- References:
- impossible rc.d ordering problem with stf and pf ?
- From: Pete French
- impossible rc.d ordering problem with stf and pf ?
- Prev by Date: Re: impossible rc.d ordering problem with stf and pf ?
- Next by Date: Re: rd.d/power_profile: dev.cpu.0.cx_supported doesn't exist
- Previous by thread: Re: impossible rc.d ordering problem with stf and pf ?
- Next by thread: Re: impossible rc.d ordering problem with stf and pf ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
