Re: rd.d/power_profile: dev.cpu.0.cx_supported doesn't exist
- From: Roland Smith <rsmith@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 20:01:01 +0100
On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 07:26:00PM +0100, Lars Stokholm wrote:
Damnit, I seem to be making one mistake after another, with no end to
it. I'm truely sorry for wasting your time.
Been there, done that. A lot of times when I had a problem with the base
system (from 5.3-RELEASE uptil now) it turned out to be "pilot error".
Let's step back to where I
started; dev.cpu.0.cx_supported *does* exist:
# sysctl dev.cpu.0.cx_supported
dev.cpu.0.cx_supported: C1/0
And here's the problem; this is what I get when I fire up FreeBSD:
...
Starting ums0 moused:.
hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest: C1
sysctl: hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest: Invalid argument
Mounting NFS file systems:.
...
Taking the power_profile into account, I guess it comes something
similar to:
# sysctl hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest=C1/0
I'm not sure that this is what is being called. The '/0' is removed by awk:
$ sysctl -n hw.acpi.cpu.cx_supported
C1/0
$ sysctl -n hw.acpi.cpu.cx_supported |awk '{ print "C" split($0, a) }' - 2>/dev/null
C1
hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest: C1
sysctl: hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest: Invalid argument
Works fine here:
# sysctl hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest=C1/0
hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest: C1 -> C1
So, finally, the question now is why I get the "invalid argument".
The only thing I can think of is that you've defined
performance_cx_lowest or economy_cx_lowest to some bogus value in rc.conf.
Roland
--
R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/
[plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated]
pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725)
Attachment:
pgp8fUrNzoDdy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: rd.d/power_profile: dev.cpu.0.cx_supported doesn't exist
- From: Lars Stokholm
- Re: rd.d/power_profile: dev.cpu.0.cx_supported doesn't exist
- References:
- rd.d/power_profile: dev.cpu.0.cx_supported doesn't exist
- From: Lars Stokholm
- Re: rd.d/power_profile: dev.cpu.0.cx_supported doesn't exist
- From: Roland Smith
- Re: rd.d/power_profile: dev.cpu.0.cx_supported doesn't exist
- From: Lars Stokholm
- Re: rd.d/power_profile: dev.cpu.0.cx_supported doesn't exist
- From: Roland Smith
- Re: rd.d/power_profile: dev.cpu.0.cx_supported doesn't exist
- From: Lars Stokholm
- Re: rd.d/power_profile: dev.cpu.0.cx_supported doesn't exist
- From: Roland Smith
- Re: rd.d/power_profile: dev.cpu.0.cx_supported doesn't exist
- From: Lars Stokholm
- Re: rd.d/power_profile: dev.cpu.0.cx_supported doesn't exist
- From: Lars Stokholm
- rd.d/power_profile: dev.cpu.0.cx_supported doesn't exist
- Prev by Date: Re: SPARC64: Can't upgrade from 6.1 to 6.2 due to binutils
- Next by Date: Re: rd.d/power_profile: dev.cpu.0.cx_supported doesn't exist
- Previous by thread: Re: rd.d/power_profile: dev.cpu.0.cx_supported doesn't exist
- Next by thread: Re: rd.d/power_profile: dev.cpu.0.cx_supported doesn't exist
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|