Re: 6.2 bge regression
- From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 15:27:46 +1030
On Monday 29 January 2007 21:32, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
Currently it's connected to a 10mbit hub :)
(Very crusty, I know)
I've tried hard wiring it to 10BaseT/UTP but no change.
I just dug out a spare switch (god knows why the hub was still in place) and
it works fine with that.
I then tried the 6.1 system with the switch and it worked (duh) but when I
went to switch back to the hub it wouldn't work..
I don't know how the 6.1 box worked with the hub since I can't get it to work
now, perhaps the hub is busted.
So, in conclusion, I think bge(4) is OK :)
--
Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au
"The nice thing about standards is that there
are so many of them to choose from."
-- Andrew Tanenbaum
GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C
Attachment:
pgprTWiaCVwnI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- 6.2 bge regression
- From: Daniel O'Connor
- Re: 6.2 bge regression
- From: Peter Jeremy
- Re: 6.2 bge regression
- From: Daniel O'Connor
- 6.2 bge regression
- Prev by Date: Re: System hang on laptop suspend/resume
- Next by Date: diskless boot /usr/local/etc/rc.d/ scripts do not run, why?
- Previous by thread: Re: 6.2 bge regression
- Next by thread: PANIC in RELENG_6 from yesterday, if_de.c
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
