Re: impossible rc.d ordering problem with stf and pf ?
- From: Pete French <petefrench@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 11:02:08 +0000
Just for my edification, what is the point of "keep state" on an
"any-to-any" rule?
It's a 'pass out' rule - without the 'keep state' the returning packets
wont get back in.
-pete.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- Re: impossible rc.d ordering problem with stf and pf ?
- From: James Long
- Re: impossible rc.d ordering problem with stf and pf ?
- Prev by Date: Re: jails and multple interfaces
- Next by Date: Re: jails and multple interfaces
- Previous by thread: Re: impossible rc.d ordering problem with stf and pf ?
- Next by thread: rd.d/power_profile: dev.cpu.0.cx_supported doesn't exist
- Index(es):