Re: Desired behaviour of "ifconfig -alias"
- From: Kevin Way <kevin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 18:25:57 -0500
Oliver Fromme wrote:
But you called it "confusing". That's just your personalIf asked what -alias does, would you really reply "it removes the
perception. It doesn't mean it is confusing to everybody.
primary IP,
while leaving the alias?" Be honest here.
Also note that it doesn't hurt anybody.
If you run RELENG_6_2, and a jail fails to start, this command is called.
And instead of unaliasing the jail's alias, it (because of a bug in the
shipped
rc.d scripts), it removes the primary IP.
So that is a real life, non-third-party incident, where a machine was
knocked
off-line unexpectedly, because of this behavior. Sure, it didn't *hurt*
me,
but knocking a machine off-line is a pretty serious side effect,
especially when
it isn't documented.
Errors in the other direction are more likely to result in a machine
remaining
reachable.
Fortunately, it appears that a fairly strong consensus is appearing in
support
of an eventual refinement of this behavior.
Best Regards,
Kevin Way
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Desired behaviour of "ifconfig -alias"
- From: Oliver Fromme
- Re: Desired behaviour of "ifconfig -alias"
- References:
- Re: Desired behaviour of "ifconfig -alias"
- From: Oliver Fromme
- Re: Desired behaviour of "ifconfig -alias"
- Prev by Date: Re: What is a good choice of sata-ii raid controller for freebsd?
- Next by Date: Re: Desired behaviour of "ifconfig -alias"
- Previous by thread: Re: Desired behaviour of "ifconfig -alias"
- Next by thread: Re: Desired behaviour of "ifconfig -alias"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|