Re: sysctl segfaulting
- From: Michael Nottebrock <lofi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 19:14:34 +0100
On Saturday, 24. February 2007 15:27, Volker wrote:
Your problem with libelf reminded me to one thing: Have you done a
`make check-old' in /usr/src already? I didn't find it in the docs
but while reading the Makefile.incl and have not been aware of that
check procedure but it clearly showed I've had some elder binaries
in my system. Please forgive me if that hint has already been posted.
No need to apologize, I appreciate every suggestion. However, by now I'm
reasonably sure this isn't some kind of mismatch/stale software problem -
there is indeed nothing stale left as far as the base system is concerned on
that box at all. Given the strange nature of the error there might even be
hardware failure involved (bad memory, possibly), I still need to check on
that front.
--
,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@xxxxxxxxxxx
(/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org
\u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org
Attachment:
pgpjYAFwR2um9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- sysctl segfaulting
- From: Michael Nottebrock
- Re: sysctl segfaulting
- From: Michael Nottebrock
- Re: Re: sysctl segfaulting
- From: Volker
- sysctl segfaulting
- Prev by Date: Pentium 640 and Enhanced SpeedStep
- Next by Date: Re: Stable on Blade server
- Previous by thread: Re: Pentium 640 and Enhanced SpeedStep
- Next by thread: Recent libxine update seems to cause ICE on 6-STABLE/amd64
- Index(es):