Re: portsnap and cvsup for rebuilding world - Which one?
- From: Doug Barton <dougb@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2007 22:14:28 -0800
Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:
It's a little out of date; instead of cvsup, you use csup which is in the base system (and only supports updating the base system, hence portsnap).
That last bit is not actually correct. csup will update anything cvsup can in checkout mode, so you can check out a src tree, a ports tree, a doc tree, etc. with csup. The only thing you can't do is mirror a repository in cvs mode. So far only cvsup can do that.
hth,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- portsnap and cvsup for rebuilding world - Which one?
- From: frzburn
- Re: portsnap and cvsup for rebuilding world - Which one?
- From: Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH
- portsnap and cvsup for rebuilding world - Which one?
- Prev by Date: Re: portsnap and cvsup for rebuilding world - Which one?
- Next by Date: Re: panic: kmem_malloc(16384): kmem_map too small: md-mounted /tmp filled up
- Previous by thread: Re: portsnap and cvsup for rebuilding world - Which one?
- Next by thread: Re: portsnap and cvsup for rebuilding world - Which one?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
