Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed
- From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@xxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:52:24 +0100
Artem Kuchin wrote:
a) It looks like your message was weirdly truncated - whole "rectangles"
of text are missing from the results on the right-hand-side. Maybe you
copied it through Excel?
Ummm... hmmm.. i checked the message in the list, nothimng is missing.
Just like it was in the putty terminal from where i copied it.
See here:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2007-March/033494.html
c) It would be interesting for the general discussion if you could
install a recent server-like version of Linux (e.g. CentOS, SuSE,
Debian) on one of the machines you did your benchmarks on to compare
results :)
I am not good at linux, but this is an interesting idea. I'll try it.
Which one
is easier to install?
Both CentOS (aka "repacked RedHat Enterprise Server") and SuSE
(actually, openSuSE which is free) are easy to install. But I think
you'll have to compile unixbench for them.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed
- From: Artem Kuchin
- Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed
- References:
- umass media size off-by-one?
- From: Craig Boston
- Re: umass media size off-by-one?
- From: Scott Long
- Re: umass media size off-by-one?
- From: Craig Boston
- Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed
- From: Artem Kuchin
- Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed
- From: Ivan Voras
- Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed
- From: Artem Kuchin
- umass media size off-by-one?
- Prev by Date: Re: Boot prompt for Intel AMT
- Next by Date: Re: Clamav-90_2 Lockup with freebsd 6.2
- Previous by thread: Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed
- Next by thread: Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
