Re: pitiful performance of an SATA150 drive
- From: Søren Schmidt <sos@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 23:35:55 +0200
Mikhail Teterin wrote:
On Monday 26 March 2007 15:21, Søren Schmidt wrote:Nopes its the stock AMD and a SiI chip..
= What HW was this again, there has been alot of updates/changes over the = last year ?
It is now a quad core (dual CPU) Opteron-275 using IWill's DK8X motherboard.
http://www.google.com/search?q=iwill+dk8x
The SATA controller(s) are by LSI, not NVidia's (unlike in Jeremy's case).
Anyhow there has been some changes in that area that actually might fix an interrupt routing bogon. Please try the attached patch against an up to date 6-stable source and let me know if that helps...
-Søren _______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: pitiful performance of an SATA150 drive
- From: Mikhail Teterin
- Re: pitiful performance of an SATA150 drive
- References:
- Re: pitiful performance of an SATA150 drive
- From: Mikhail Teterin
- Re: pitiful performance of an SATA150 drive
- From: Søren Schmidt
- Re: pitiful performance of an SATA150 drive
- From: Mikhail Teterin
- Re: pitiful performance of an SATA150 drive
- Prev by Date: Re: pitiful performance of an SATA150 drive
- Next by Date: Re: installation issue 6.2 AMD64-bit 3ware 9550SX
- Previous by thread: Re: pitiful performance of an SATA150 drive
- Next by thread: Re: pitiful performance of an SATA150 drive
- Index(es):