Re: pitiful performance of an SATA150 drive
- From: Marc Santhoff <M.Santhoff@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 09:22:17 +0200
Am Montag, den 26.03.2007, 14:36 -0400 schrieb Mikhail Teterin:
Over a year later this remains a problem -- exactly as described below...
No other SATA devices are present -- the only other IDE device is the DVD
drive. My main disks are SCSI.
What's MUCH worse is that the (slowly) written data is also often corrupted...
I use the drive to store our vast collection of photos and the backups. Every
once in a while I encounter a corrupt JPEG file, and the backups are _always_
corrupt somewhere. Doing something like:
dump 0auChf 16 0 - /home | bzip2 -9 > /store/home.0.bz2
always produces a corrupt file (as per ``bzip2 -t''). I used to blame the
drive's temperature, but it now sits in its own enclosure and stays under 40
Celsius.
When the drive is accessed, there are (according to `systat -vm') many
thousands of interrupts 17 -- on my system these are shared between pcm0 and
ehci0. Why are these triggered by accessing SATA is unclear, but the Intr's
share of the CPU time is often above 80% of one processor's total (I have 4
processors).
As I mentioned a year ago, Knoppix was accessing the same drive at much higher
speeds, so I don't believe, the problem is with the hardware...
Please, advise. Thanks!
FWIW: You could try cleaning the connectors and use a fresh new cable
for the connection (the spec has a very small value for plugging the
connectors at the cable).
I had massive problems and got rid of them that way ...
Marc
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: pitiful performance of an SATA150 drive
- From: Stephen Clark
- Re: pitiful performance of an SATA150 drive
- From: Clayton Milos
- Re: pitiful performance of an SATA150 drive
- References:
- Re: pitiful performance of an SATA150 drive
- From: Mikhail Teterin
- Re: pitiful performance of an SATA150 drive
- Prev by Date: kern/94669
- Next by Date: Re: pitiful performance of an SATA150 drive
- Previous by thread: Re: pitiful performance of an SATA150 drive
- Next by thread: Re: pitiful performance of an SATA150 drive
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|