Re: network performance 6.1 stable vs 4.9
- From: Ian Smith <smithi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 01:19:43 +1000 (EST)
On Fri, 25 May 2007, Stephen Clark wrote:
[..]
[..]He has been comparing the 6.1 system to 4.9 system for a couple of weeks
and continues to insist the 6.1 version is much slower.
In subjective tests R&D has done using the following setup we see "no"
problem:
freebsd+firefox <--100mbs lan---> 6.1 network appliance <----T1
link----> internet
freebsd+firefox <--100mbs lan---> 4.9 network appliance <----T1
link----> internet
One of our testers has the same setup but is using winblows/ie in place of
freebsd+firefox and subjectively says the 6.1 system is slower than the
4.9 system.
I was just wandering if there were any tunables that might cause this.
Not to be too flippant, but is your win(what?)/ie tester tunable enough
to encourage into doing some objective, repeatable, illustrative tests?
Clearing browser caches and such before switching between systems, etc?
Cheers, Ian
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- Re: network performance 6.1 stable vs 4.9
- From: Stephen Clark
- Re: network performance 6.1 stable vs 4.9
- Prev by Date: LORs (was Re: ghosthunting: machine freeze 6.2R)
- Next by Date: Re: can I change probe order of mpt controllers?
- Previous by thread: Re: network performance 6.1 stable vs 4.9
- Next by thread: Re: network performance 6.1 stable vs 4.9
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
