Re: how much beer do I need to get this patch applied?

On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 11:47:49 -0500, Dan Rue wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 11:50:23AM -0400, Javier Henderson wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 10:13:06 -0500, Dan Rue wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 08:47:48PM -0700, Jo Rhett wrote:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/88486

This patch was supplied 2 years ago now. It doesn't change
current/ expected behavior but does allow those of us with many,
many systems to not get useless e-mail.

It's not even my patch! I would simply like to see this done...

I second that notion. Isn't the *nix model to be quiet when
everything is OK?

So if it's quiet, is it because it's OK, or because it's too broken to
complain?

If it's too broken to complain, then the behavior is the same with or
without this patch.

I'm just referring to the assertion that the Unix model is to be quiet when everything is OK. Maybe it's a personal preference, I guess.

-jav
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"

Relevant Pages

  • Re: how much beer do I need to get this patch applied?
    ... This patch was supplied 2 years ago now. ... current/ expected behavior but does allow those of us with many, ... So if it's quiet, is it because it's OK, or because it's too broken to ... If it's too broken to complain, then the behavior is the same with or ...
    (freebsd-stable)
  • Re: how much beer do I need to get this patch applied?
    ... This patch was supplied 2 years ago now. ... expected behavior but does allow those of us with many, ... So if it's quiet, is it because it's OK, or because it's too broken to complain? ...
    (freebsd-stable)
  • Re: how much beer do I need to get this patch applied?
    ... This patch was supplied 2 years ago now. ... expected behavior but does allow those of us with many, ... Isn't the *nix model to be quiet when everything ...
    (freebsd-stable)
  • Re: ISS Apache Advisory Response
    ... >In the case of this advisory, ISS X-Force provided an Apache patch and did ... >not see a need for a long quiet period. ... ISS X-Force minimizes the quiet period and delay of protecting ...
    (Bugtraq)
  • Re: post patch dns activity
    ... apparently expected behavior after applying the patch and resolves a port ... randomization vulnerabilty. ... which ZoneAlarm has released an upgrade for, ... that the patch addresses, ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.dns)