Re: Problems with named default configuration in 6-STABLE

On Tuesday 17 July 2007 10:52:43 Volker wrote:
<snip>
Relying on a zone transfer doesn't seem to be reliable to me as more
than half of the root servers doesn't reply to AXFR requests.

I've heard pretty much the same thing as you did wrt. root name servers
denying AXFR, but as "it works" (TM), I don't see a reason not to use it. And
it seems that the author of the FreeBSD default named.conf thought likewise,
which is pretty okay with me (from the experience I gathered this morning).

By the way: using the roots as hints only adds to the number of requests your
server has to do in order to retrieve first-level domain name servers, so in
the end, the transmitted data should be way higher than doing one AXFR to
find them (simply because you'll see a large subset of those toplevel domains
being requested when you're publically offering a DNS server). And the data
is also cached on an AXFR in persistant storage, which is another major
benefit (for me).

--
Heiko Wundram
Product & Application Development
-------------------------------------
Office Germany - EXPO PARK HANNOVER

Beenic Networks GmbH
Mailänder Straße 2
30539 Hannover

Fon +49 511 / 590 935 - 15
Fax +49 511 / 590 935 - 29
Mail wundram@xxxxxxxxxx


Beenic Networks GmbH
-------------------------------------
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hannover
Geschäftsführer: Jorge Delgado
Registernummer: HRB 61869
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Hannover
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"

Relevant Pages