jail fstab

Joel Hatton wrote:
Hi,

I'm dredging up an old issue here, but it appears to be unresolved in
RELENG_5_5 at this time.

The RELENG_5_5 tag is static, so nothing will change in it. You
mention a patch version below however, so you should be aware that
only the most crucial security fixes are ever applied to security
branches.

In short, the jail_mount_fstab function is not given the fstab file on
which the local variables depend.

This problem is fixed in RELENG_5, so if you were to upgrade to
5-stable you wouldn't have this problem anymore.

You should also seriously consider upgrading to 6-stable at least,
since fewer and fewer fixes will be backported to the 5.x branch as
time goes by.

Doug

--

This .signature sanitized for your protection
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"

Relevant Pages

  • jail fstab
    ... The RELENG_5_5 tag is static, so nothing will change in it. ... only the most crucial security fixes are ever applied to security ... This problem is fixed in RELENG_5, so if you were to upgrade to ... 5-stable you wouldn't have this problem anymore. ...
    (FreeBSD-Security)
  • RE: Update BIOS?
    ... I don't think it's a problem anymore. ... would become garbage after flashing it during a power failure. ... looks like I'll hold off on upgrading my BIOS. ... those who said to upgrade, have ya done a BIOS upgrade before? ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers)
  • Re: Has Microsoft Stopped Revising VB Components?
    ... and I upgrade to VB6 and update all users' components can I ... >> assume I don't have to worry about this problem anymore? ...
    (microsoft.public.vb.general.discussion)