rm(1) bug, possibly serious
- From: Oliver Fromme <olli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 17:12:50 +0200 (CEST)
Hi,
Today I noticed the following behaviour on a 6-stable
machine:
$ cd /tmp
$ mkdir -p foo/var
$ cd foo/bar
$ rm -rf ../
rm: ../: Invalid argument
$ rm -rf ../
$
Note that the command "rm -rf ../" was entered twice.
The first time I got an error message (and exit code 1),
the second time it apparently succeeded. The very same
command.
Further investigation:
$ cd /tmp
$ mkdir -p foo/var
$ cd foo/bar
$ rm -rf ../
rm: ../: Invalid argument
$ ls -al ..
ls: ..: No such file or directory
$ ls /tmp/foo/bar
ls: /tmp/foo/bar: No such file or directory
That means: Even though "rm -rf ../" prints an error
message, indicating that the argument is invalid, it
*DOES* remove the contents of the parent directory!
To add further confusion, another "rm -rf ../" does
not print an error message and seemingly succeeds,
even though ".." does not exist anymore in the current
directory (which has been removed).
Shall I file a PR? Or is rm working correctly, and
my assumptions are wrong?
Best regards
Oliver
--
Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing b. M.
Handelsregister: Registergericht Muenchen, HRA 74606, Geschäftsfuehrung:
secnetix Verwaltungsgesellsch. mbH, Handelsregister: Registergericht Mün-
chen, HRB 125758, Geschäftsführer: Maik Bachmann, Olaf Erb, Ralf Gebhart
FreeBSD-Dienstleistungen, -Produkte und mehr: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd
"The scanf() function is a large and complex beast that often does
something almost but not quite entirely unlike what you desired."
-- Chris Torek
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: rm(1) bug, possibly serious
- From: Jan Grant
- Re: rm(1) bug, possibly serious
- From: Torfinn Ingolfsen
- Re: rm(1) bug, possibly serious
- From: Oleg Nauman
- Re: rm(1) bug, possibly serious
- From: Maxim Khitrov
- Re: rm(1) bug, possibly serious
- Prev by Date: Re: device polling and weird timer interrupt count from vmstat
- Next by Date: Re: rm(1) bug, possibly serious
- Previous by thread: 6.2-STABLE does not lauch 2nd core of Pentium e2160 CPU
- Next by thread: Re: rm(1) bug, possibly serious
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|