Re: rm(1) bug, possibly serious
- From: Oliver Fromme <olli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 19:43:57 +0200 (CEST)
Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
Oliver Fromme wrote:
$ cd /tmp
$ mkdir -p foo/var
$ cd foo/bar
$ rm -rf ../
rm: ../: Invalid argument
$ rm -rf ../
$
Note that the command "rm -rf ../" was entered twice.
The first time I got an error message (and exit code 1),
the second time it apparently succeeded. The very same
command.
What happens if you issue a 'pwd' command after each 'rm -rf ../'?
We want to see the output.
It's /tmp/foo/bar every time.
IMHO, the only way the second rm command *should* succeed, is if it
invalidates the current working directory, thus releasing the last lock
on the directory.
Quick testing here:
[...]
Ok, I think it is a bug.
Yes, I think so, too.
By the way, an additional confusion is that ".." and "../"
are handled differently. Specifying ".." always leads to
this message:
rm: "." and ".." may not be removed
and nothing is actually removed. It is confusing that
adding a slash leads to a different error message _and_
removal of the contents of the parent directory. Clearly
a POLA violation.
Best regards
Oliver
--
Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing b. M.
Handelsregister: Registergericht Muenchen, HRA 74606, Geschäftsfuehrung:
secnetix Verwaltungsgesellsch. mbH, Handelsregister: Registergericht Mün-
chen, HRB 125758, Geschäftsführer: Maik Bachmann, Olaf Erb, Ralf Gebhart
FreeBSD-Dienstleistungen, -Produkte und mehr: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd
"Perl will consistently give you what you want,
unless what you want is consistency."
-- Larry Wall
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: rm(1) bug, possibly serious
- From: Bob Johnson
- Re: rm(1) bug, possibly serious
- From: Nicolas Rachinsky
- Re: rm(1) bug, possibly serious
- From: LI Xin
- Re: rm(1) bug, possibly serious
- References:
- Re: rm(1) bug, possibly serious
- From: Torfinn Ingolfsen
- Re: rm(1) bug, possibly serious
- Prev by Date: Re: device polling and weird timer interrupt count from vmstat
- Next by Date: Re: in openpam_load_module(): no pam_unix.so found
- Previous by thread: Re: rm(1) bug, possibly serious
- Next by thread: Re: rm(1) bug, possibly serious
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|