Re: nfe driver 6.2 stable

On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 10:28:01AM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
[snip]
ATM nfe(4)'s interrupt moderation mechanism doesn't seem to work
at all so nfe(4) generates too many interrupts. However I don't
think it wouldn't be major bottleneck of the performance.

Could this be why (on -current) I had to enable polling on nfe0 to get rid of
the choppy audio playback I was experiencing?

--
Jos Backus
jos at catnook.com
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"

Relevant Pages

  • Re: nfe driver 6.2 stable
    ... at all so nfegenerates too many interrupts. ... think it wouldn't be major bottleneck of the performance. ... Pyun YongHyeon ...
    (freebsd-stable)
  • Re: panic: Lock so_rcv_sx not exclusively locked
    ... not least the possibility of an inter-thread deadlock if the blocked socket ... After applying this patch I can no longer panic the system by killing ... Jos Backus ...
    (freebsd-current)