Re: Also seeing 2 x quad-core system slower that 2 x dual core
- From: "Claus Guttesen" <kometen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 16:57:34 +0100
I think I also just came up against the same effect that the original poster
saw. I have two sets of machines here - one is a pair of dual core Xeons,
the other a pair of quad core Xeons. They are HP servers, more or less
identical apart from the processors I belive.
Both have 7.0-BETA3 installed, and the same config on them with the
same files. I am trying to delete a gigabyte of files using 'rm -rf'
On the dual core processors this takes about 20 seconds. On the quad
cores it takes about 3 minutes! This is true for both the 32 and 64 bit
versions of FreeBSD :-(
ULE- or 4BSD-scheduler?
Bit OT: Are the servers DL360 or DL380 (G5)? I will upgrade a DL380
server from 6.2 to 7.0 (beta3) in order to gain some performance
tomorrow.
--
regards
Claus
When lenity and cruelty play for a kingdom,
the gentlest gamester is the soonest winner.
Shakespeare
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Also seeing 2 x quad-core system slower that 2 x dual core
- From: Pete French
- Re: Also seeing 2 x quad-core system slower that 2 x dual core
- References:
- Also seeing 2 x quad-core system slower that 2 x dual core
- From: Pete French
- Also seeing 2 x quad-core system slower that 2 x dual core
- Prev by Date: Also seeing 2 x quad-core system slower that 2 x dual core
- Next by Date: Re: FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE always hang
- Previous by thread: Also seeing 2 x quad-core system slower that 2 x dual core
- Next by thread: Re: Also seeing 2 x quad-core system slower that 2 x dual core
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|