Re: Also seeing 2 x quad-core system slower that 2 x dual core
- From: Kris Kennaway <kris@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 20:20:37 +0100
Matt Reimer wrote:
On Nov 29, 2007 10:58 AM, Kris Kennaway <kris@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Pete French wrote:On the dual core processors this takes about 20 seconds. On the quadThat almost certainly has nothing to do with how many CPUs your system
cores it takes about 3 minutes! This is true for both the 32 and 64 bit
versions of FreeBSD :-(
has, since rm -rf is a single process running on a single core.
I wonder if I'm seeing this too. Running super-smack on a 2 x quad
core 1.6GHz Dell 1950 I get about 40000 qps, whereas on a 2 x dual
core 3.0GHz box I've seen 80000 qps.
Please, let's try to stay focused :) rm -rf has nothing to do with super-smack and vice versa.
> Is this expected?
It is not very surprising. super-smack is not a good SMP benchmark, it does stupid things like 1-byte I/O, so it is not very scalable nor a good model of real-world database activity. Accounting for your CPUs being twice as fast on the dual core, it roughly says that the benchmark is not scaling beyond 4 CPUs, which is in line with my own observations.
Kris
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Also seeing 2 x quad-core system slower that 2 x dual core
- From: Matt Reimer
- Re: Also seeing 2 x quad-core system slower that 2 x dual core
- References:
- Also seeing 2 x quad-core system slower that 2 x dual core
- From: Pete French
- Re: Also seeing 2 x quad-core system slower that 2 x dual core
- From: Kris Kennaway
- Re: Also seeing 2 x quad-core system slower that 2 x dual core
- From: Matt Reimer
- Also seeing 2 x quad-core system slower that 2 x dual core
- Prev by Date: FreeBSD 6.3-RC1 Available...
- Next by Date: Re: 2 x quad-core system is slower that 2 x dual core on FreeBSD
- Previous by thread: Re: Also seeing 2 x quad-core system slower that 2 x dual core
- Next by thread: Re: Also seeing 2 x quad-core system slower that 2 x dual core
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|