Re: Also seeing 2 x quad-core system slower that 2 x dual core
- From: Alexey Popov <lol@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 10:16:26 +0300
Hi
Pete French wrote:
dirhash is a cache of directories that store many files. FreeBSD has unreasonably small default for the maximum size of this cache.Have you checked that your dir hash isn't suffering due to lack of memory
this can have a marked impact on seemingly trivial things like this as
could silly things like the RAID card being installed in a different slot.
RAID card is onboard on these things - how would I check the dir hash ? The
slower server has 16 gig of RAM, the faster one has 4 gig. Both were
installed the same way in the same order, so should have the same disc layout
more or less.
See sysctl -a | grep dirhash and tune up vfs.ufs.dirhash_maxmem if vfs.ufs.dirhash_mem is near to the limit.
Also could you please provide `top` and `systat -vm 1` output on dual- and quad-core systems during your tests?
With best regards,
Alexey Popov
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- Re: Also seeing 2 x quad-core system slower that 2 x dual core
- From: Pete French
- Re: Also seeing 2 x quad-core system slower that 2 x dual core
- Prev by Date: Re: FreeBSD 7b3 - ZFS crashes
- Next by Date: 7.0 BETA3 - slow TCP upload (TSO related?)
- Previous by thread: Re: Also seeing 2 x quad-core system slower that 2 x dual core
- Next by thread: Re: Also seeing 2 x quad-core system slower that 2 x dual core
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|