Re: Also seeing 2 x quad-core system slower that 2 x dual core
- From: Pete French <petefrench@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 12:17:00 +0000
Check vfs.ufs.dirhash_mem is not close to vfs.ufs.dirhash_maxmem if it is
and only most used boxes this seems to be the case increase maxmem.
Its nowhere near - and the dirhash_maxmem and dirhash_minsize are the same
on both boxes.
Seems this could either do with an auto tune option or a larger max by
default in today's day and age.
quite possibly - I will keep an eye on them and up them if necessary
anyway, so thanks for the info. but this isn't whats causing the difference
in performance here.
-pete.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- Re: Also seeing 2 x quad-core system slower that 2 x dual core
- From: Steven Hartland
- Re: Also seeing 2 x quad-core system slower that 2 x dual core
- Prev by Date: Re: Also seeing 2 x quad-core system slower that 2 x dual core
- Next by Date: Re: Also seeing 2 x quad-core system slower that 2 x dual core
- Previous by thread: Re: Also seeing 2 x quad-core system slower that 2 x dual core
- Next by thread: Re: Also seeing 2 x quad-core system slower that 2 x dual core
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
