Re: Also seeing 2 x quad-core system slower that 2 x dual core
- From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 16:30:50 +0100
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Check dmesg for the APIC numbers corresponding to the CPUs you want to
disable and add the corresponding entries to /boot/loader.conf, e.g.:
hint.lapic.1.disable="1"
hint.lapic.3.disable="1"
hint.lapic.5.disable="1"
hint.lapic.7.disable="1"
Hi,
Do you know how his method compares to setting machdep.hlt_cpus ?
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Also seeing 2 x quad-core system slower that 2 x dual core
- From: Kris Kennaway
- Re: Also seeing 2 x quad-core system slower that 2 x dual core
- References:
- Re: Also seeing 2 x quad-core system slower that 2 x dual core
- From: Max Laier
- Re: Also seeing 2 x quad-core system slower that 2 x dual core
- From: Pete French
- Re: Also seeing 2 x quad-core system slower that 2 x dual core
- From: Claus Guttesen
- Re: Also seeing 2 x quad-core system slower that 2 x dual core
- From: Kris Kennaway
- Re: Also seeing 2 x quad-core system slower that 2 x dual core
- Prev by Date: Re: Also seeing 2 x quad-core system slower that 2 x dual core
- Next by Date: Re: Also seeing 2 x quad-core system slower that 2 x dual core
- Previous by thread: Re: Also seeing 2 x quad-core system slower that 2 x dual core
- Next by thread: Re: Also seeing 2 x quad-core system slower that 2 x dual core
- Index(es):