Re: Also seeing 2 x quad-core system slower that 2 x dual core
- From: Kris Kennaway <kris@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 17:15:11 +0100
Ivan Voras wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Check dmesg for the APIC numbers corresponding to the CPUs you want to
disable and add the corresponding entries to /boot/loader.conf, e.g.:
hint.lapic.1.disable="1"
hint.lapic.3.disable="1"
hint.lapic.5.disable="1"
hint.lapic.7.disable="1"
Hi,
Do you know how his method compares to setting machdep.hlt_cpus ?
That is not supported with ULE (and will lead to deadlocks), but I don't know off-hand if hyperthreading virtual CPUs have their own apic...ok, it does on one of my systems at least, so that is probably the way to go when possible.
Kris
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- Re: Also seeing 2 x quad-core system slower that 2 x dual core
- From: Max Laier
- Re: Also seeing 2 x quad-core system slower that 2 x dual core
- From: Pete French
- Re: Also seeing 2 x quad-core system slower that 2 x dual core
- From: Claus Guttesen
- Re: Also seeing 2 x quad-core system slower that 2 x dual core
- From: Kris Kennaway
- Re: Also seeing 2 x quad-core system slower that 2 x dual core
- From: Ivan Voras
- Re: Also seeing 2 x quad-core system slower that 2 x dual core
- Prev by Date: Re: Also seeing 2 x quad-core system slower that 2 x dual core
- Next by Date: Re: FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE always hang
- Previous by thread: Re: Also seeing 2 x quad-core system slower that 2 x dual core
- Next by thread: Re: Also seeing 2 x quad-core system slower that 2 x dual core
- Index(es):