Re: Packet loss every 30.999 seconds
- From: Alfred Perlstein <alfred@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 12:08:10 -0800
* David G Lawrence <dg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [071219 09:12] wrote:
Try it with "find / -type f >/dev/null" to duplicate the problem
almost
instantly.
I was able to verify last night that (cd /; tar -cpf -) > all.tar would
trigger the problem. I'm working getting a test running with
David's ffs_sync() workaround now, adding a few counters there should
get this narrowed down a little more.
Unfortunately, the version of the patch that I sent out isn't going to
help your problem. It needs to yield at the top of the loop, but vp isn't
necessarily valid after the wakeup from the msleep. That's a problem that
I'm having trouble figuring out a solution to - the solutions that come
to mind will all significantly increase the overhead of the loop.
As a very inadequate work-around, you might consider lowering
kern.maxvnodes to something like 20000 - that might be low enough to
not trigger the problem, but also be high enough to not significantly
affect system I/O performance.
I apologize for not reading the code as I am swamped, but a technique
that Matt Dillon used for bufs might work here.
Can you use a placeholder vnode as a place to restart the scan?
you might have to mark it special so that other threads/things
(getnewvnode()?) don't molest it, but it can provide for a convenient
restart point.
--
- Alfred Perlstein
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Packet loss every 30.999 seconds
- From: David G Lawrence
- Re: Packet loss every 30.999 seconds
- References:
- Packet loss every 30.999 seconds
- From: Mark Fullmer
- Re: Packet loss every 30.999 seconds
- From: David G Lawrence
- Re: Packet loss every 30.999 seconds
- From: Mark Fullmer
- Re: Packet loss every 30.999 seconds
- From: Bruce Evans
- Re: Packet loss every 30.999 seconds
- From: Mark Fullmer
- Re: Packet loss every 30.999 seconds
- From: David G Lawrence
- Packet loss every 30.999 seconds
- Prev by Date: Re: Performance!
- Next by Date: Re: Packet loss every 30.999 seconds
- Previous by thread: Re: Packet loss every 30.999 seconds
- Next by thread: Re: Packet loss every 30.999 seconds
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|