Re: SMP on FreeBSD 6.x and 7.0: Worth doing?
- From: Ulrich Spoerlein <uspoerlein@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 11:33:50 +0100
On Fri, 21.12.2007 at 22:31:24 -0700, Brett Glass wrote:
As has been reported in some other messages on this list, Linux is currently
blowing FreeBSD away. It's taking as much as 20% less time to get through
the benchmark, depending on exactly how the random shuffle came out. This is
with 4 GB RAM, the GENERIC FreeBSD SMP kernel (using SCHED_ULE), and aufs as
the storage schema for Squid.
Apples and Oranges, I know, but if you're building a "simple" reverse
cacheing proxy, have you considered Varnish? Would be very interessting
how it would compare to a) FreeBSD+Squid b) Linux+Squid and c)
Linux+Varnish.
Cheers,
Ulrich Spoerlein
--
It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool,
than to speak, and remove all doubt.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: SMP on FreeBSD 6.x and 7.0: Worth doing?
- From: Adrian Chadd
- Re: SMP on FreeBSD 6.x and 7.0: Worth doing?
- References:
- SMP on FreeBSD 6.x and 7.0: Worth doing?
- From: Brett Glass
- SMP on FreeBSD 6.x and 7.0: Worth doing?
- Prev by Date: Re: SMP on FreeBSD 6.x and 7.0: Worth doing? freenx@deweyonline.com
- Next by Date: Re: jlogin.sh - a small nice jails helper!
- Previous by thread: Re: SMP on FreeBSD 6.x and 7.0: Worth doing? freenx@deweyonline.com
- Next by thread: Re: SMP on FreeBSD 6.x and 7.0: Worth doing?
- Index(es):