Re: SMP on FreeBSD 6.x and 7.0: Worth doing?
- From: Brett Glass <brett@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 06:23:32 -0700
At 05:21 AM 12/22/2007, Pieter de Goeje wrote:
Since you're using the fs as a cache, I presume it wouldn't be a big problem
if the data was lost by a power outage (or crash). If so, you can try the
async mount option to seriously increase fs performance.
Linux also speeds up if you try mounting the volume -async, maintaining a similar advantage. And mounting the volume -async is a bit dangerous, because the cache can become very inconsistent during a crash.... SoftUpdates is generally what's recommended.
--Brett Glass
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- SMP on FreeBSD 6.x and 7.0: Worth doing?
- From: Brett Glass
- Re: SMP on FreeBSD 6.x and 7.0: Worth doing?
- From: Pieter de Goeje
- SMP on FreeBSD 6.x and 7.0: Worth doing?
- Prev by Date: Re: SMP on FreeBSD 6.x and 7.0: Worth doing? freenx@deweyonline.com
- Next by Date: Re: usb/umass, devfs: this sucks
- Previous by thread: Re: SMP on FreeBSD 6.x and 7.0: Worth doing?
- Next by thread: Re: SMP on FreeBSD 6.x and 7.0: Worth doing?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|