Re: UFS snapshot weirdness
- From: Guido Falsi <mad@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 16:46:45 +0100
Eirik Øverby wrote:
I read somewhere else about NFS issues on 7-RC* where snapshots have been used. In particular - and this is something I'm seeing too - changing the exports file or reloading mountd gives the following in messages log:
Feb 19 18:58:09 anduin mountd[38867]: can't delete exports for /tmp: Invalid argument
Feb 19 18:58:09 anduin mountd[38867]: can't delete exports for /usr: Cross-device link
Feb 19 18:58:09 anduin mountd[38867]: can't delete exports for /var: Cross-device link
Feb 19 18:58:09 anduin mountd[38867]: can't delete exports for /export/home: Cross-device link
Feb 19 18:58:09 anduin mountd[38867]: can't delete exports for /opt: Cross-device link
Can this be related? I'm starting to worry here - what will be the long-term consequences if snapshots are stuck around in this "invisible" state?
I have been experiencing these too. But it looks more like a bug in mountd, since it shows up only is snapshots are created with mount. If snapshots are created with mksnap_ffs this does not seem to show up.
I still have to make more in depth experiments, but before experimenting by myself I'd like to have some more informed directions on what to experiment.
--
Guido Falsi <mad@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: UFS snapshot weirdness
- From: Eirik Øverby
- Re: UFS snapshot weirdness
- References:
- UFS snapshot weirdness
- From: Eirik Øverby
- Re: UFS snapshot weirdness
- From: Daniel O'Connor
- Re: UFS snapshot weirdness
- From: Eirik Øverby
- Re: UFS snapshot weirdness
- From: Daniel O'Connor
- Re: UFS snapshot weirdness
- From: Eirik Øverby
- UFS snapshot weirdness
- Prev by Date: RELENG_7 - Witness warnings re USB audio
- Next by Date: Flaky USB behavior on 7.0 RC3
- Previous by thread: Re: UFS snapshot weirdness
- Next by thread: Re: UFS snapshot weirdness
- Index(es):