Re: fsck_ufs: cannot alloc 94208 bytes for inoinfo
- From: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 17:33:13 +1100
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 11:53:01AM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
You can also reduce fsck time by reducing the number of cylinder
groups on the disk. I usually max them out (-c 999 and newfs then
sets it to the maximum, usually in the 50-80 range). This will
improve performance but not reduce the memory required.
Note that this advice is relevant for UFS1 only. In UFS2, '-c'
specifies the cylinder group size in _BLOCKS_ not cylinders and
defaults to the maximum size for the given blocksize and IPG etc.
--
Peter Jeremy
Please excuse any delays as the result of my ISP's inability to implement
an MTA that is either RFC2821-compliant or matches their claimed behaviour.
Attachment:
pgpcJGuA6xBen.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- Re: fsck_ufs: cannot alloc 94208 bytes for inoinfo
- From: Oliver Fromme
- Re: fsck_ufs: cannot alloc 94208 bytes for inoinfo
- From: Matthew Dillon
- Re: fsck_ufs: cannot alloc 94208 bytes for inoinfo
- Prev by Date: Re: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE Available
- Next by Date: FreeBSD 7.0 Questions
- Previous by thread: Re: fsck_ufs: cannot alloc 94208 bytes for inoinfo
- Next by thread: pthread_cond_wait hanging in libthr
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|