Re: jerky mouse still in 7.0-RELEASE

Dominic Fandrey wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Dominic Fandrey wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Your problem has different symptoms, so not entirely surprising that it doesn't help :) Sounds more like that your mouse just isn't working properly with moused.

Oh, it works fine on the console. Only the combination moused/X clashes.

Well it doesn't rule it out. X may be introducing latencies that are causing your mouse to lose sync or something.

It's not the mouse that hangs.

OK, that was unclear from your initial wording.

> It's the only thing that works,
everything else hangs when I combine moused/X. This issue doesn't exist on all my systems, though. It existed on my old Thinkpad (Pentium-m 1.3 GHz), it exists on my new notebook (Core2 Duo with 2.4 GHz), but it doesn't exist on my P4 with 1.6 GHz.

Key entries, animations, they all just pile up somewhere and happen all at once when I start using the mouse. To watch a movie I have to keep the mouse moving all the time.

It's not a general X and mouse problem, because without moused in between everything works fine. I think at some point in time a bug was either introduced in moused, or in my opinion more likely, in the sysmouse protocol implementation in X.

Could also be an interrupt issue. Either way it's still a different issue to the ones in this thread.

Kris
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Quad core worth it?
    ... it's not immediately clear whether current games can actually ... In some cases it seems that a Core2 Duo E6400 can actually turn in ... slightly slower performance than a 3.0 GHZ P4. ... The difference being 87 FPS and 114 FPS respectively. ...
    (comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action)
  • Re: Quad core worth it?
    ... it's not immediately clear whether current games can actually ... In some cases it seems that a Core2 Duo E6400 can actually turn in ... slightly slower performance than a 3.0 GHZ P4. ... The difference being 87 FPS and 114 FPS respectively. ...
    (comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action)
  • Re: dual or quad core for sw2009?
    ... not going to a quad core when sw2009 is released. ... large assemblies & was planning on: ... Core2 duo E8500 3.16 ghz ...
    (comp.cad.solidworks)