Re: nfs-server silent data corruption
- From: "Arno J. Klaassen" <arno@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 22 Apr 2008 19:51:59 +0200
Hello,
Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 08:30:48PM +0200, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
NB, (CC to kris@ for this) why is memtest86 port marked as i386-only?
Basically because it's a bootable i386 binary image.
yop, but building it could be allowed on more archs (at least amd64 imho)
but no hard feelings! just a thought
Best, Arno
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- nfs-server silent data corruption
- From: Arno J. Klaassen
- Re: nfs-server silent data corruption
- From: Kris Kennaway
- Re: nfs-server silent data corruption
- From: Arno J. Klaassen
- Re: nfs-server silent data corruption
- From: Jeremy Chadwick
- Re: nfs-server silent data corruption
- From: Arno J. Klaassen
- Re: nfs-server silent data corruption
- From: Peter Jeremy
- nfs-server silent data corruption
- Prev by Date: Re: nfs-server silent data corruption
- Next by Date: Re: LOR on sleepqueue chain locks, Was: LOR sleepq/scrlock
- Previous by thread: Re: nfs-server silent data corruption
- Next by thread: Re: nfs-server silent data corruption
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|