Re: broken re(4)

On Wed, 28 May 2008 09:28:23 +0900 Pyun YongHyeon <pyunyh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote
about Re: broken re(4):

PY> > Any hints what I should do next to find the culprit?

PY> There were similiar reports on this issue. It seems that it's very
PY> hard to make re(4) work so many RTL8168/8169/8111 revisions without
PY> documentation as different revisions require different workaround.

I know. However, in this case I think I have identical hardware, but two
boards work, and one doesn't (which seems very strange to me).

PY> Anyway, would you try this one? The patch was generated against HEAD
PY> but it would apply to STABLE too.
PY> http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/re/re.HEAD.20080519

Thanks. I applied the patch and a new nanobsd image is build right now. I
will report later today about the results.


cu
Gerrit
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"