Re: [freebsd-stable] Re: BIND update?
- From: "Kevin Oberman" <oberman@xxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 14:47:01 -0700
From: "Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET" <ml@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 10:03:24 -0400 (EDT)
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@xxxxxxxxxxx
Shouldn't you also add :
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 12:25:33PM +0200, Oliver Brandmueller wrote:
OK, thanx for clarification. I totally overlooked the updated bind port;
anyhow, I use base system bind and didn't plan to change that (although
it might me a good idea, as this situation clearly shows).
You can always use the WITH_REPLACE_BASE option in the port to
overwrite the base system named, or use the differences in the
extracted tarball of 9.5.0 vs 9.5.0-P1 to update the source of the
base one yourself.
NO_BIND= true # do not build BIND
into /etc/make.conf if you do, so it doesn't get clobbered?
Or, for V7, add :
WITHOUT_BIND=1
to /etc/src.conf.
And this assumes that you will be re-building the system before the base
system is patched. Note that this will also cause mergemaster to ask
about deleting /etc/rc.d/named. Just say 'no'!
--
R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
Energy Sciences Network (ESnet)
Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab)
E-mail: oberman@xxxxxx Phone: +1 510 486-8634
Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4 EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751
Attachment:
pgpuzeEi1k7mA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- Re: [freebsd-stable] Re: BIND update?
- From: Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
- Re: [freebsd-stable] Re: BIND update?
- Prev by Date: panic: clist reservation botch
- Next by Date: Re: Hard(?) lock when reassociating ath with wpa_supplicant on RELENG_7
- Previous by thread: Re: [freebsd-stable] Re: BIND update?
- Next by thread: Any idea when a bind update will be forthcoming?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
