Re: alpm(4) I/O range is claimed by ACPI
- From: John Baldwin <jhb@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 11:37:32 -0400
On Tuesday 16 September 2008 10:58:54 pm KAHO Toshikazu wrote:
Hello,then
I am sorry to mistake copying message-id and break mail thread.
I tried looking for this device in the DSDT, I don't see anything which
obviously resembles it. The equivalent Linux driver has a means of
forcing the mapping to be set up if it isn't available:
http://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/i2c/busses/i2c-ali15x3
It looks like there used to be a means of doing this in the FreeBSD
driver but it got nuked. And that ASUS didn't much care about power
management support in this machine...
If you can re-enable it in such a way that it uses bus_alloc_resource(),
the driver will probably work fine.
How to re-enable it? Please give me some points. PCIR_BAR is always 0,
even if any values are written by pciconf.
Well, bus_alloc_resource() will allocate resources for the BAR and update the
BAR for you, the question is if you need to hardcode the range to
bus_alloc_resource() or not.
--
John Baldwin
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: alpm(4) I/O range is claimed by ACPI
- From: KAHO Toshikazu
- Re: alpm(4) I/O range is claimed by ACPI
- References:
- Re: alpm(4) I/O range is claimed by ACPI
- From: Bruce M Simpson
- Re: alpm(4) I/O range is claimed by ACPI
- From: John Baldwin
- Re: alpm(4) I/O range is claimed by ACPI
- From: KAHO Toshikazu
- Re: alpm(4) I/O range is claimed by ACPI
- Prev by Date: Re: 6.3 reboot -d doesn't work
- Next by Date: Re: ACPI "blacklist" question
- Previous by thread: Re: alpm(4) I/O range is claimed by ACPI
- Next by thread: Re: alpm(4) I/O range is claimed by ACPI
- Index(es):