Re: freebsd-update painfully slow - slower than source code build of world and kernel
- From: Daniel Bond <db@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 10:04:02 +0100
Yes, I am also noticing this. Luckily interrupting it and starting it again resumes. Judging from the speed of http://www.daemonology.net/ (hosted on same site), the freebsd-update server must be absolutely hammered.
On Jan 6, 2009, at 9:50 AM, Stefan Miklosovic wrote:
My opinion is same. I tried to upgrade from 7.0-RELEASE to 7.1- RELEASE but even after
copying all the stuff from 7.0-RELEASE CD (src etc) and having GENERIC kernel in /boot/,
"freebsd-update upgrade -r 7.1-RELEASE" started to work properly but hase not done its work.
All tries stopped at some failure during a downloading. I have been trying this about half a day,
three times, but no change :((
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Daniel Bond <db@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'm not sure where to post this, I had trouble finding a suitable mailing-list. Please point me in the right direction, if this is the wrong place to post this message.
First off, I love the binary update tool for FreeBSD. It is an excellent tool, and saves a lot of time and trouble compared to the old method (or so I thought, until recently).
I also like seeing the freebsd-update method is in the release notes for 7.1-RELEASE, as a official way to upgrade a system.
Yesterday I was struck by happiness, as I noticed 7.1-RELEASE was out on ftp.freebsd.org - and decided to start off by upgrading one of my companies development servers.
Usually an update with FreeBSD-update is quite quick, but today and yesterday it has just been to slow to use, after two days of trying - I've still not completed a single upgrade. The
server in question is connected to gigabit internet.
I think it is embarrassing that the binary update tool, is actually slower to use than compiling the whole operating system and kernel - even on a slow machine! The reason for this,
is not the tool it self, the tool is excellent - but there are no mirrors.. We need some mirrors, or such a great tool is not really usable at all (except for the really patient).
This also goes for portsnap. Portsnap is also an excellent tool, but the experience from using it could be much better. The european portsnap mirror is actually slower, than the one in the US.
I've been in contact with Colin, twice, about hosting another portsnap mirror. Using a proxy server, does not cut it - not for my use, sorry. I tried it, it didn't help. The last time I didn't receive an
As I was saying to Colin, both myself and a friend who works for the Norwegian government, should be able to run a mirror for portsnap on good bandwidth. Many other people have offered
to host mirrors, why is having mirrors a bad thing?
I know the 6.4 and 7.1 releases have very many patches, due to conversion from CVS to SVN. I have previously upgraded servers in Norway and UK to 6.4-RELEASE with freebsd-update,
and speed has been acceptable, not great, but enough to keep me using and loving the tool. Still, I think more people will use freebsd-update, since it is more practical to use, especially for
non homogenous environments.
Hopefully this will improve in the future, I don't mean to come across as a whining grunge, but it is quite frustrating to me, as a loving freebsd user.
Congrats on a new release, I will be using it in a another day or so (or whenever freebsd-update is done - maybe I will eat my own words, and just do a regular build)!
freebsd-stable@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx "
freebsd-stable@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Prev by Date: Re: 7.1 Live Filesystem CD
- Next by Date: Re: HEADS UP: snd_hda MFC plan
- Previous by thread: freebsd-update painfully slow - slower than source code build of world and kernel
- Next by thread: Re: freebsd-update painfully slow - slower than source code build of world and kernel