Re: Does this disk/filesystem layout look sane to you?
- From: Pete French <petefrench@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 08:48:02 +0100
The new 2tb disk you buy can very often be actually a few sectors
smaller then the disk you are trying to replace, this in turn will
lead to zfs not accepting the new disk as a replacement, because it's
smaller (no matter how small).
Heh - you are in for a pleasent surprise my friend! ;-) If you actually
try this in practice you will find ZFS *does* accept a smaller drive as
a replacement. Preseumably to cope with the natural variability in sector
size that you describe.
Surprised me too the first time I saw it...
-pete.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Does this disk/filesystem layout look sane to you?
- From: Dan Naumov
- Re: Does this disk/filesystem layout look sane to you?
- References:
- Re: Does this disk/filesystem layout look sane to you?
- From: Dan Naumov
- Re: Does this disk/filesystem layout look sane to you?
- Prev by Date: Re: Does this disk/filesystem layout look sane to you?
- Next by Date: Re: Does this disk/filesystem layout look sane to you?
- Previous by thread: Re: Does this disk/filesystem layout look sane to you?
- Next by thread: Re: Does this disk/filesystem layout look sane to you?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|