Re: drives >2TB on mpt device



On Mon, 4 Apr 2011 14:36:25 +0100 Bruce Cran <bruce@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
about Re: drives >2TB on mpt device:

Hi Bruce,

BC> It looks like a known issue:
BC> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/147572

Hm, I don't know if this is exactly what I'm seeing here (although the
cause may be the same):
I do not use mptutil. The controller is "dumb" (without actual raid
processor), and I intend to use it with zfs. However, I cannot even get
gpart to create a partition larger than 2TB, because mpt comes back with
only 2TB after probing the drive. As this is a problem that already exists
with 1 drive, I cannot use gstripe or zfs to get around this.
But the PR above states that this limitation is already built into mpt, so
my only chance is probably to try a different controller/driver (any
suggestions for a cheap 8port controller to use with zfs?), or to wait
until mpt is updated to support larger drives. Does anyone know if there
is already ongoing effort to do this?


cu
Gerrit
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"



Relevant Pages

  • Re: mpt problems. (Re: Dell hardware raid 0 (sas5ir) or gmirror?)
    ... The error messages from mpt are attached in the file called 'messages'. ... The kernel probe boot time log is attached as dmesg.log. ... at boot time both drives report that they have 255 tag ... drives to anything 120 or above the drive controller complains under ...
    (freebsd-stable)
  • Re: drives >2TB on mpt device
    ... about Re: drives>2TB on mpt device: ... The controller is "dumb" (without actual raid ... I cannot use gstripe or zfs to get around this. ... until mpt is updated to support larger drives. ...
    (freebsd-stable)
  • Re: problems with ultra320
    ... > MPT) seems to have fixed our stability problems as well. ... The drives are now in production. ...
    (freebsd-stable)
  • Re: ZFS w/failing drives - any equivalent of Solaris FMA?
    ... That was a thread recently on the Open Solaris ZFS forum - and discussed at length... ... controller from Supermicro you are using, ... Well, I've tested these cards for a number of months now, and they seem fine here - at least with the WD drives I'm currently running. ... If it pulls the disk off the channel, ...
    (freebsd-hackers)
  • Re: ZFS w/failing drives - any equivalent of Solaris FMA?
    ... I think the problem at the moment is, ZFS "doesn't care" - it's ... controller from Supermicro you are using, ... fine here - at least with the WD drives I'm currently running (not saying ... such a way that the I/O requests are returned immediately as 'failed' (i.e. ...
    (freebsd-hackers)