Re: linux-f10-flashplugin

On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:06 PM, Alexander Leidinger
<Alexander@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 12:50:01 -0700 Ted Faber <faber@xxxxxxx> wrote:

On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 02:41:39PM -0400, Michael Butler wrote:
On 09/29/11 13:57, Norbert Augenstein wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:08:25PM +0400, S.N.Grigoriev wrote:
28.09.2011, 21:10, "Conrad J. Sabatier"<conrads@xxxxxxx>:
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 11:50:08 -0500
"Conrad J. Sabatier"<conrads@xxxxxxx>  wrote:


I see that as well as:

(process:5430): Gtk-WARNING **: Locale not supported by C library.
      Using the fallback 'C' locale.

      (npviewer.bin:5430): GLib-WARNING **: getpwuid_r(): failed due
      to unknown user id (2139)

      (npviewer.bin:5430): Gtk-WARNING **: cannot open display: :0.0
      *** NSPlugin Wrapper *** ERROR: failed to initialize
plugin-side RPC client connection
      NOTE: child process received `Goodbye', closing down


I haven't explored the getpwuid_r thing.


Can you all please confirm that you run the most recent FreeBSD version
(of your branch), as in "with the recent security fixes"? There are
reports that one of them may have caused what you see.


sun_path from sockaddr_un on Linux is 108 bytes long, while on FreeBSD
it is 104.
With recent security patch anything bigger than 104 is disallowed, so
support for unix
sockets in linuxolator is broken.

I propose the following patch:
http://student.agh.edu.pl/~mjguzik/linux_sockaddr_un.patch

Thanks,
--
Mateusz Guzik
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Security Announcements & Incremental Patches
    ... >> There is a difference between security fixes and a 'more low-key and ... >> conservative set of changes intended for our next mainstream release'. ... > generating production server for example. ... > FreeBSD community has to make the choice: ...
    (FreeBSD-Security)
  • Re: Security Announcements & Incremental Patches
    ... > There is a difference between security fixes and a 'more low-key and ... > conservative set of changes intended for our next mainstream release'. ... generating production server for example. ... FreeBSD community has to make the choice: ...
    (FreeBSD-Security)
  • Re: ARRRRGH! Guys, whos breaking -STABLEs GMIRROR code?!
    ... "STABLE" means "you can update FreeBSD along this branch without needing ... can ship binary drivers for their hardware and say "this driver will work ... This is completely stable and only tracks security fixes. ...
    (freebsd-stable)
  • Re: Do we need this junk?
    ... FreeBSD! ... systems are a static non moving target ??? ... Julian Elischer wrote "we". ... "This is why we provide errata / security fixes. ...
    (freebsd-current)
  • Re: upgrading to a specified version?
    ... release) + security fixes + bug fixes or small backports from the ... although this is not very likely for FreeBSD 4 anymore. ...
    (freebsd-questions)