freebsd-stable

• Thread Index

---

• Re: ACPI broke going from 8 to 9
  • From: Adrian Chadd
• Re: ACPI broke going from 8 to 9
  • From: Adrian Chadd
• Re: ACPI broke going from 8 to 9
  • From: Dan Allen
• [releng_9 tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64
  • From: FreeBSD Tinderbox
• [releng_9 tinderbox] failure on i386/i386
  • From: FreeBSD Tinderbox
• Re: ACPI broke going from 8 to 9
  • From: Jeremy Chadwick
• ACPI broke going from 8 to 9
  • From: Dan Allen
• Re: 9.0-RC2 re(4) "no memory for jumbo buffers" issue
  • From: Mike Andrews
• Re: 9.0-RC2 re(4) "no memory for jumbo buffers" issue
  • From: YongHyeon PYUN
• 9.0-RC3 umass quirks?
  • From: George Mitchell
• 9-RC3 VIMAGE on kvm DNS problem
  • From: mailintern
• Re: 9.0-RC2 re(4) "no memory for jumbo buffers" issue
  • From: Mike Andrews
• Re: PRINTF_BUFR_SIZE=4096?
  • From: John Baldwin
• svn2cvs fixed again
  • From: Simon L. B. Nielsen
• Re: Escaping from a jail with root privileges on the host
  • From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav
• Re: Escaping from a jail with root privileges on the host
  • From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith
• Re: Escaping from a jail with root privileges on the host
  • From: Julian Elischer
• Re: [SOLVED] stuck /etc/rc autoboot processes
  • From: Damien Fleuriot
• Re: stuck /etc/rc autoboot processes
  • From: Damien Fleuriot
• Re: stuck /etc/rc autoboot processes
  • From: Damien Fleuriot
• Re: stuck /etc/rc autoboot processes
  • From: Jeremy Chadwick
• Re: stuck /etc/rc autoboot processes
  • From: Sergey Kandaurov
• Re: stuck /etc/rc autoboot processes
  • From: Damien Fleuriot
• Re: stuck /etc/rc autoboot processes
  • From: Sergey Kandaurov
• Re: stuck /etc/rc autoboot processes
  • From: Sergey Kandaurov
• Re: stuck /etc/rc autoboot processes
  • From: Damien Fleuriot
• Re: "required by"?
  • From: mailinglists
• Re: Escaping from a jail with root privileges on the host
  • From: Poul-Henning Kamp
• Re: stuck /etc/rc autoboot processes
  • From: Damien Fleuriot
• Re: Escaping from a jail with root privileges on the host
  • From: Bjoern A. Zeeb
• Escaping from a jail with root privileges on the host
  • From: Marin Atanasov Nikolov
• Re: minor regression after patching
  • From: Volodymyr Kostyrko
• Re: minor regression after patching
  • From: Dimitry Andric
• Re: "required by"?
  • From: Christopher Hilton
• Re: minor regression after patching
  • From: Xin Li
• Re: stuck /etc/rc autoboot processes
  • From: Jeremy Chadwick
• stuck /etc/rc autoboot processes
  • From: Damien Fleuriot
• Re: minor regression after patching
  • From: Volodymyr Kostyrko
• Re: minor regression after patching
  • From: Volodymyr Kostyrko
• Re: minor regression after patching
  • From: Dimitry Andric
• Re: minor regression after patching
  • From: Volodymyr Kostyrko
• Re: minor regression after patching
  • From: Sergey Kandaurov
• Re: minor regression after patching
  • From: David Wolfskill
• minor regression after patching
  • From: Volodymyr Kostyrko
• Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool
  • From: Ruben van Staveren
• Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool
  • From: Chris Rees
• Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool
  • From: Kurt Buff
• Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool
  • From: Jeremy Chadwick
• Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool
  • From: Kurt Buff
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Adrian Chadd
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Stefan Esser
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Daniel Kalchev
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: Vincent Hoffman
• Re: PRINTF_BUFR_SIZE=4096?
  • From: Jeremy Chadwick
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Steve Kargl
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Andriy Gapon
• Re: PRINTF_BUFR_SIZE=4096?
  • From: Charlie Martin
• Re: PRINTF_BUFR_SIZE=4096?
  • From: Jeremy Chadwick
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Adrian Chadd
• Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool
  • From: George Kontostanos
• Re: PRINTF_BUFR_SIZE=4096?
  • From: Andriy Gapon
• PRINTF_BUFR_SIZE=4096?
  • From: Charlie Martin
• Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool
  • From: Peter Jeremy
• Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool
  • From: George Kontostanos
• Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool
  • From: Shawn Webb
• Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool
  • From: George Kontostanos
• Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool
  • From: Gary Palmer
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: Garrett Cooper
• Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool
  • From: Peter Jeremy
• Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool
  • From: Eitan Adler
• Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool
  • From: George Kontostanos
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Steve Kargl
• Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool
  • From: Lars Engels
• Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool
  • From: rloefgren
• Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool
  • From: George Kontostanos
• Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool
  • From: Matthew Seaman
• Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool
  • From: George Kontostanos
• Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool
  • From: Guy Helmer
• Re: Goo lists to subscribe to hear quickly about vulns ? ( was: Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool)
  • From: Matthew Seaman
• Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool
  • From: Mike Tancsa
• Re: Goo lists to subscribe to hear quickly about vulns ? ( was: Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool)
  • From: Bas Smeelen
• Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool
  • From: Michael Butler
• Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool
  • From: George Kontostanos
• Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool
  • From: Bas Smeelen
• Re: Goo lists to subscribe to hear quickly about vulns ? ( was: Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool)
  • From: Shawn Webb
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: O. Hartmann
• Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool
  • From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith
• Goo lists to subscribe to hear quickly about vulns ? ( was: Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool)
  • From: Damien Fleuriot
• Re: Mystery panic, FreeBSD 7.2-PRE
  • From: Charlie Martin
• Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool
  • From: Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
• Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool
  • From: Karl Denninger
• Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool
  • From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith
• Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool
  • From: Bas Smeelen
• Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool
  • From: Shawn Webb
• Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool
  • From: Mike Tancsa
• Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool
  • From: Damien Fleuriot
• Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool
  • From: Joe Holden
• Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool
  • From: Damien Fleuriot
• Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool
  • From: Damien Fleuriot
• Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool
  • From: Joe Holden
• Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool
  • From: Damien Fleuriot
• Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool
  • From: John Baldwin
• FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool
  • From: Damien Fleuriot
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: Jeremy Chadwick
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: John Baldwin
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: Vincent Hoffman
• Re: Mystery panic, FreeBSD 7.2-PRE
  • From: Kostik Belousov
• Re: directory listing hangs in "ufs" state
  • From: Alan Cox
• Re: emacs-devel glib-warning
  • From: Denise H. G.
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: Garrett Cooper
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Steve Kargl
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Doug Barton
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Adrian Chadd
• Re: Mystery panic, FreeBSD 7.2-PRE
  • From: Jeremy Chadwick
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: Jeremy Chadwick
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: O. Hartmann
• Mystery panic, FreeBSD 7.2-PRE
  • From: Charlie Martin
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Andriy Gapon
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Steve Kargl
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Andriy Gapon
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Steve Kargl
• Re: emacs-devel glib-warning
  • From: John Baldwin
• Re: FreeBSD 9 RC3 and VirtualBox
  • From: Jim King
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Steve Kargl
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Oliver Brandmueller
• Re: FreeBSD 9 RC3 and VirtualBox
  • From: Joshua Boyd
• emacs-devel glib-warning
  • From: 1126
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Steve Kargl
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: George Mitchell
• Re: Using mmap(2) with a hint address
  • From: Ganael LAPLANCHE
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Luigi Rizzo
• Re: directory listing hangs in "ufs" state
  • From: Kostik Belousov
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Adrian Chadd
• Re: FreeBSD 9 RC3 and VirtualBox
  • From: Adam Vande More
• Re: FreeBSD 9 RC3 and VirtualBox
  • From: perryh
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Steve Kargl
• Re: FreeBSD 9 RC3 and VirtualBox
  • From: Mike Tancsa
• Re: FreeBSD 9 RC3 and VirtualBox
  • From: Johan Hendriks
• FreeBSD 9 RC3 and VirtualBox
  • From: Joshua Boyd
• Re: FreeBSD 9 RC3 and VirtualBox
  • From: Joshua Boyd
• Re: "required by"?
  • From: Bartosz Fabianowski
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: Alexander Leidinger
• Re: "required by"?
  • From: Mike Tancsa
• "required by"?
  • From: 1126
• Re: directory listing hangs in "ufs" state
  • From: Andrey Zonov
• Re: Unbalanced timer interrupts under VMWare?
  • From: Ivan Voras
• Re: Unbalanced timer interrupts under VMWare?
  • From: Maxim Dounin
• REMAINDER: Call for FreeBSD Status Reports - 4Q/2011
  • From: Daniel Gerzo
• Unbalanced timer interrupts under VMWare?
  • From: Ivan Voras
• Re: Is the svn2cvs gateway down ?
  • From: Bjoern A. Zeeb
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: Francois Tigeot
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: Stefan Esser
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: Michael Larabel
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: Ian Smith
• Re: Is the svn2cvs gateway down ?
  • From: Doug Barton
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: Michael Larabel
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: matthew
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: Adrian Chadd
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: Matthew Tippett
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: O. Hartmann
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: Matthew Tippett
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: Jeremy Chadwick
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: O. Hartmann
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: Samuel J. Greear
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: O. Hartmann
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: Igor Mozolevsky
• Re: [9.0-RC3] tar xf with zip archive is broken
  • From: Martin Matuska
• Re: fsck_ufs out of swapspace
  • From: Peter Holm
• Re: Using mmap(2) with a hint address
  • From: Artem Belevich
• Re: Using mmap(2) with a hint address
  • From: Tijl Coosemans
• status of ports and clang
  • From: Mark Linimon
• Re: battery display broken
  • From: Ian Smith
• 8.2 Problem with creating Snapshots on large file systems? Cannot backup anymore.
  • From: Karl M. Joch
• Re: Using mmap(2) with a hint address
  • From: Ganael LAPLANCHE
• [9.0-RC3] tar xf with zip archive is broken
  • From: Patrick Lamaiziere
• Re: Is the svn2cvs gateway down ?
  • From: Bjoern A. Zeeb
• Re: Using mmap(2) with a hint address
  • From: Andriy Gapon
• Re: Using mmap(2) with a hint address
  • From: Ganael LAPLANCHE
• Re: Using mmap(2) with a hint address
  • From: Ganael LAPLANCHE
• Re: x11/sessreg: build fails with CLANG in FreeBSD 9.0-PRERELEASE
  • From: O. Hartmann
• Re: x11/sessreg: build fails with CLANG in FreeBSD 9.0-PRERELEASE
  • From: Michiel Boland
• Re: x11/sessreg: build fails with CLANG in FreeBSD 9.0-PRERELEASE
  • From: O. Hartmann
• Is the svn2cvs gateway down ?
  • From: Claude Buisson
• Re: Using mmap(2) with a hint address
  • From: Tijl Coosemans
• x11/sessreg: build fails with CLANG in FreeBSD 9.0-PRERELEASE
  • From: O. Hartmann
• Re: Using mmap(2) with a hint address
  • From: Andriy Gapon
• Re: battery display broken
  • From: Dominic Fandrey
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: Garrett Cooper
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: Christer Solskogen
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: Garrett Cooper
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: Christer Solskogen
• Re: fsck_ufs out of swapspace
  • From: Kostik Belousov
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: Christer Solskogen
• Using mmap(2) with a hint address
  • From: Ganael LAPLANCHE
• Re: fsck_ufs out of swapspace
  • From: Peter Jeremy
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Alexander Best
• Re: fsck_ufs out of swapspace
  • From: Michiel Boland
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Andriy Gapon
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Ivan Klymenko
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: O. Hartmann
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: Alexander Yerenkow
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: Andreas Nilsson
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: Edho Arief
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: Samuel J. Greear
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: O. Hartmann
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: Lev Serebryakov
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: Lev Serebryakov
• Re: 8.2->9.prerel: gmirror failed with error 19
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Adrian Chadd
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: matthew
• network with two gateways and one network card
  • From: Jack Raats
• Re: 8.2->9.prerel: gmirror failed with error 19
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: 8.2->9.prerel: gmirror failed with error 19
  • From: Kevin Oberman
• Re: 8.2->9.prerel: gmirror failed with error 19
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: 8.2->9.prerel: gmirror failed with error 19
  • From: Jeremy Chadwick
• Re: 8.2->9.prerel: gmirror failed with error 19
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Adrian Chadd
• Re: 8.2->9.prerel: gmirror failed with error 19
  • From: Andrey V. Elsukov
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: O. Hartmann
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Alexander Best
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Alexander Best
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Andrey Chernov
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Ian Smith
• Re: fsck_ufs out of swapspace
  • From: Paul Mather
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Adrian Chadd
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Bruce Cran
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Andriy Gapon
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Adrian Chadd
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Andriy Gapon
• fsck_ufs out of swapspace
  • From: Michiel Boland
• Re: 8.2->9.prerel: gmirror failed with error 19
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: George Mitchell
• Re: 8.2->9.prerel: gmirror failed with error 19
  • From: Andrey V. Elsukov
• Re: swi4: clock taking 40% cpu?!?
  • From: Jason Hellenthal
• Re: swi4: clock taking 40% cpu?!?
  • From: Jason Hellenthal
• Re: 8.2->9.prerel: gmirror failed with error 19
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: 8.2->9.prerel: gmirror failed with error 19
  • From: Andrey V. Elsukov
• Re: Spinlock panic in FreeBSD 7
  • From: Andriy Gapon
• 8.2->9.prerel: gmirror failed with error 19
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: 7-STABLE: mergemaster tzsetup question
  • From: Doug Barton
• Re: switching schedulers (Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default)
  • From: Doug Barton
• Spinlock panic in FreeBSD 7
  • From: Charlie Martin
• Re: switching schedulers (Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default)
  • From: Luigi Rizzo
• Re: switching schedulers (Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default)
  • From: Doug Barton
• Re: switching schedulers (Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default)
  • From: Michel Talon
• Re: switching schedulers (Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default)
  • From: Doug Barton
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1
  • From: Michel Talon
• Re: switching schedulers (Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default)
  • From: Michel Talon
• Re: switching schedulers (Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default)
  • From: Doug Barton
• Re: switching schedulers (Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default)
  • From: Adrian Chadd
• Re: net/samba36 winbindd core dump on group lookup
  • From: Jeremy Chadwick
• net/samba36 winbindd core dump on group lookup
  • From: Shaun Meyer
• Re: battery display broken
  • From: Oliver Pinter
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: Adrian Chadd
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: Arnaud Lacombe
• Re: battery display broken
  • From: Ian Smith
• Re: switching schedulers (Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default)
  • From: Luigi Rizzo
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: Stefan Esser
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Attilio Rao
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: Attilio Rao
• Re: switching schedulers (Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default)
  • From: Stefan Esser
• switching schedulers (Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default)
  • From: Luigi Rizzo
• battery display broken
  • From: Dominic Fandrey
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: O. Hartmann
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: Joe Holden
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: Arnaud Lacombe
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: C. P. Ghost
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Steve Kargl
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: Chris Rees
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: Kevin Oberman
• Re: swi4: clock taking 40% cpu?!?
  • From: Jeremy Chadwick
• Re: swi4: clock taking 40% cpu?!?
  • From: Dan Nelson
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Attilio Rao
• Re: swi4: clock taking 40% cpu?!?
  • From: Jeremy Chadwick
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Mike Tancsa
• swi4: clock taking 40% cpu?!?
  • From: Doug Barton
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Ivan Klymenko
• Re: Two problems still present in RC3
  • From: John Baldwin
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: Chris Rees
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Attilio Rao
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: Freddie Cash
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: O. Hartmann
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: O. Hartmann
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Daniel Kalchev
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: O. Hartmann
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Jeremy Chadwick
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Bruce Cran
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Attilio Rao
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Mike Tancsa
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Attilio Rao
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Mike Tancsa
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Attilio Rao
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Attilio Rao
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Attilio Rao
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Attilio Rao
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1Server
  • From: Andriy Gapon
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Eitan Adler
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Steven Hartland
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Lars Engels
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: Sergey Matveychuk
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: Volodymyr Kostyrko
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: Michael Larabel
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Steven Hartland
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: Daniel Kalchev
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: Daniel Kalchev
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: Jeremy Chadwick
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: Stefan Esser
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: Michael Larabel
• Re: directory listing hangs in "ufs" state
  • From: Kostik Belousov
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: Samuel J. Greear
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1Server
  • From: Steven Hartland
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1Server
  • From: Gót András
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: Jeremy Chadwick
• Re: directory listing hangs in "ufs" state
  • From: Andrey Zonov
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: Patrick M. Hausen
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: Michael Ross
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1Server
  • From: Michael Larabel
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1Server
  • From: Steven Hartland
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: Michael Larabel
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: Michael Larabel
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: Michael Ross
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Tom Evans
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Matthew Seaman
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: perryh
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: Michael Ross
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Ivan Klymenko
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Daniel Kalchev
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Oliver Pinter
• Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: Adrian Chadd
• Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
  • From: O. Hartmann
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Jeremy Chadwick
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Oliver Pinter
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Jeremy Chadwick
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: George Mitchell
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: O. Hartmann
• Re: kernel: negative sbsize for uid = 0
  • From: Doug Barton
• Re: directory listing hangs in "ufs" state
  • From: Jeremy Chadwick
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Marcus Reid
• Re: directory listing hangs in "ufs" state
  • From: Andrey Zonov
• Re: kernel: negative sbsize for uid = 0
  • From: Dan Nelson
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Mark Linimon
• Re: directory listing hangs in "ufs" state
  • From: Andrey Zonov
• Re: directory listing hangs in "ufs" state
  • From: Alan Cox
• Re: directory listing hangs in "ufs" state
  • From: Jeremy Chadwick
• Re: directory listing hangs in "ufs" state
  • From: Andrey Zonov
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Ivan Klymenko
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Tom Evans
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Andrey Chernov
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Mike Tancsa
• Re: Hot-changing a failed HDD with ahci.ko
  • From: Patrick M. Hausen
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: George Mitchell
• Re: Hot-changing a failed HDD with ahci.ko
  • From: Patrick M. Hausen
• Re: Hot-changing a failed HDD with ahci.ko
  • From: Jeremy Chadwick
• Hot-changing a failed HDD with ahci.ko
  • From: Patrick M. Hausen
• Re: Two problems still present in RC3
  • From: Ed Schouten
• Re: Two problems still present in RC3
  • From: Benjamin Kaduk
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Bruce Evans
• Re: Two problems still present in RC3
  • From: Brett Glass
• Re: Two problems still present in RC3
  • From: Brett Glass
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: George Mitchell
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Ivan Klymenko
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: mdf
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Ivan Klymenko
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Ivan Klymenko
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Marcus Reid
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Jilles Tjoelker
• Re: directory listing hangs in "ufs" state
  • From: Jeremy Chadwick
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Doug Barton
• Re: 7-STABLE: mergemaster tzsetup question
  • From: Doug Barton
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Malin Randstrom
• kernel: negative sbsize for uid = 0
  • From: Doug Barton
• directory listing hangs in "ufs" state
  • From: Andrey Zonov
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Mike Tancsa
• Re: Sporadic 9.0-RC2 boot-time panic
  • From: Mike Andrews
• Re: Two problems still present in RC3
  • From: Ed Schouten
• Re: Two problems still present in RC3
  • From: Ben Kaduk
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Steve Kargl
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: O. Hartmann
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Jeremy Chadwick
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: O. Hartmann
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: George Mitchell
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Adrian Chadd
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Andrey Chernov
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Ivan Klymenko
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Daniel Kalchev
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Jeremy Chadwick
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: George Mitchell
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Doug Barton
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Bruce Cran
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: O. Hartmann
• [releng_9 tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc
  • From: FreeBSD Tinderbox
• Re: mfi(4) issues in 9.0-RC3
  • From: John Baldwin
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Garrett Wollman
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Bruce Cran
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Steve Kargl
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Garrett Wollman
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Scott Lambert
• Re: stable/9 preferring IPv4 over IPv6, what changed?
  • From: Ulrich Spörlein
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: John Baldwin
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Steve Kargl
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Gary Jennejohn
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Gary Jennejohn
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Ivan Klymenko
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Pieter de Goeje
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: mdf
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Bruce Cran
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Lars Engels
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Lars Engels
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Gary Jennejohn
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Steve Kargl
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Vincent Hoffman
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: O. Hartmann
• Re: how to get the source tree
  • From: Matthew Seaman
• how to get the source tree
  • From: Man Chan
• Re: Two problems still present in RC3
  • From: Brett Glass
• Re: mfi(4) issues in 9.0-RC3
  • From: Jan Mikkelsen
• Re: stable/9 preferring IPv4 over IPv6, what changed?
  • From: Detlef Peeters
• Re: stable/9 preferring IPv4 over IPv6, what changed?
  • From: Dimitry Andric
• stable/9 preferring IPv4 over IPv6, what changed?
  • From: Ulrich Spörlein
• Re: Two problems still present in RC3
  • From: Ben Kaduk
• Re: Two problems still present in RC3
  • From: Johan Hendriks
• Re: how to update source tree
  • From: Lystopad Olexandr
• Re: how to update source tree
  • From: Bane Ivosev
• how to update source tree
  • From: Man Chan
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Attilio Rao
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Eitan Adler
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: George Mitchell
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Eitan Adler
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Attilio Rao
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: George Mitchell
• Re: Two problems still present in RC3
  • From: Jeremy Chadwick
• Default FS = ufs, local, journaled soft-updates (was Re: FreeBSD 9.0-RC3 Available...)
  • From: Mike Tancsa
• Re: Two problems still present in RC3
  • From: Damien Fleuriot
• Re: Two problems still present in RC3
  • From: Brett Glass
• Re: Two problems still present in RC3
  • From: Johan Hendriks
• Re: mfi(4) issues in 9.0-RC3
  • From: John Baldwin
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Attilio Rao
• Re: Two problems still present in RC3
  • From: Damien Fleuriot
• Re: Two problems still present in RC3
  • From: Damien Fleuriot
• Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: Volodymyr Kostyrko
• mfi(4) issues in 9.0-RC3
  • From: Jan Mikkelsen
• SCHED_ULE should not be the default
  • From: George Mitchell
• Re: Two problems still present in RC3
  • From: Johan Hendriks
• Two problems still present in RC3
  • From: Brett Glass
• FreeBSD 9.0-RC3 Available...
  • From: Ken Smith
• Re: tmpfs deadlock on stable/9
  • From: Dmitry Morozovsky
• WITHOUT_OPENSSH=true in src.conf
  • From: Oliver Brandmueller
• Re: tmpfs deadlock on stable/9
  • From: Dmitry Morozovsky
• Re: Sporadic 9.0-RC2 boot-time panic
  • From: Mike Andrews
• Re: tmpfs deadlock on stable/9
  • From: Dmitry Morozovsky
• Re: tmpfs deadlock on stable/9
  • From: Kostik Belousov
• Re: tmpfs deadlock on stable/9
  • From: Dmitry Morozovsky
• Re: tmpfs deadlock on stable/9
  • From: Kostik Belousov
• tmpfs deadlock on stable/9
  • From: Dmitry Morozovsky
• Re: r228152: anyone got the None cipher working with base OpenSSH?
  • From: Jeremy Chadwick
• Re: TCP Reassembly Issues
  • From: Johannes Totz
• Re: 9.0-RC3
  • From: Bjoern A. Zeeb
• Re: 9.0-RC3
  • From: George Kontostanos
• Re: 9.0-RC3
  • From: Dimitry Andric
• Re: 9.0-RC3
  • From: Matthew Seaman
• 9.0-RC3
  • From: George Kontostanos
• Re: PAE broken on 7-STABLE
  • From: Eitan Adler
• Re: PAE broken on 7-STABLE
  • From: Arnaud Lacombe
• Re: PAE broken on 7-STABLE
  • From: Arnaud Lacombe
• Re: PAE broken on 7-STABLE
  • From: Alan Cox
• Re: Sporadic 9.0-RC2 boot-time panic
  • From: Mike Andrews
• Re: PAE broken on 7-STABLE
  • From: Eitan Adler
• PAE broken on 7-STABLE
  • From: Arnaud Lacombe
• Re: r228152: anyone got the None cipher working with base OpenSSH?
  • From: Freddie Cash
• Re: 7-STABLE: mergemaster tzsetup question
  • From: Doug Barton
• Re: Something missing in truss
  • From: Kostik Belousov
• Re: Something missing in truss
  • From: Eivind Evensen
• Re: 7-STABLE: mergemaster tzsetup question
  • From: Edwin Groothuis
• Re: 7-STABLE: mergemaster tzsetup question
  • From: Doug Barton
• Re: 7-STABLE: mergemaster tzsetup question
  • From: Doug Barton
• Re: Something missing in truss
  • From: Dan Nelson
• Re: FreeNAS to Custom FAMP Server
  • From: cliftonr
• Re: 7-STABLE: mergemaster tzsetup question
  • From: Matthew Seaman
• Re: 7-STABLE: mergemaster tzsetup question
  • From: Max Khon
• Re: 7-STABLE: mergemaster tzsetup question
  • From: David Wolfskill
• 7-STABLE: mergemaster tzsetup question
  • From: Christian Weisgerber
• Re: r228152: anyone got the None cipher working with base OpenSSH?
  • From: Jeremy Chadwick
• Re: r228152: anyone got the None cipher working with base OpenSSH?
  • From: Adam Vande More
• Re: r228152: anyone got the None cipher working with base OpenSSH?
  • From: Freddie Cash
• Re: r228152: anyone got the None cipher working with base OpenSSH?
  • From: Jeremy Chadwick
• Re: r228152: anyone got the None cipher working with base OpenSSH?
  • From: Bjoern A. Zeeb
• Re: r228152: anyone got the None cipher working with base OpenSSH?
  • From: Jeremy Chadwick
• r228152: anyone got the None cipher working with base OpenSSH?
  • From: Freddie Cash
• After 50 News Weekly / Niagara
  • From: After 50 News Weekly / Niagara
• Re: ps, systat vs top shows different process owner?
  • From: Jeremy Chadwick
• ps, systat vs top shows different process owner?
  • From: Bartosz Stec
• Something missing in truss
  • From: Eivind Evensen
• Re: Sporadic 9.0-RC2 boot-time panic
  • From: Mike Andrews
• Re: www/Apache22 fails to build when configured for LDAP and AUTHNZ_LDAP
  • From: Shaun Meyer
• FreeNAS to Custom FAMP Server
  • From: list, mailing
• Re: Possible: Configure SAS Sun Jbod J4200 ?
  • From: Ronald Klop
• Re: Low nfs write throughput
  • From: John Baldwin
• Re: Low nfs write throughput
  • From: Jeremy Chadwick
• Re: Low nfs write throughput
  • From: Daryl Sayers

• Security
• UNIX
• Linux
• Coding
• Usenet

• Mailing-Lists
• Newsgroups
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint

unix.derkeiler.com  > Mailing-Lists  > FreeBSD  > stable  > 2011-12