Re: flowtable usable or not
- From: Doug Barton <dougb@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 00:46:02 -0800
On 03/01/2012 16:03, K. Macy wrote:
I understand the switch. Uptime is important in any production
network. However, it seems like it may have been too easy to turn it
off because no one has made any effort to help me debug the issues. By
analogy your guidance for ports usability problems would be to install
Ubuntu.
Apparently you've missed all the times that I've given that exact advice. :)
But your analogy is severely flawed. Flowtable was an experimental
feature that theoretically might have increased performance for some
work flows, but turned out to be fatally flawed. The ports system is an
essential part of the FreeBSD operating *system*, depended on by
virtually 100% of FreeBSD users.
Users don't have any obligation to help us debug new/experimental features.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: flowtable usable or not
- From: K. Macy
- Re: flowtable usable or not
- References:
- Re: flowtable usable or not
- From: Steve Wills
- Re: flowtable usable or not
- From: Doug Barton
- Re: flowtable usable or not
- From: K. Macy
- Re: flowtable usable or not
- Prev by Date: Re: Resume broken in 8.3-PRERELEASE
- Next by Date: Disk disconnects, with immediate reconnect
- Previous by thread: Re: flowtable usable or not
- Next by thread: Re: flowtable usable or not
- Index(es):