Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD ?
- From: Chris Rees <utisoft@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 11:35:13 +0100
On Jun 4, 2012 9:50 AM, "Dave Hayes" <dave@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Mark Linimon <linimon@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 07:24:11PM -0700, Dave Hayes wrote:
I see features and pkgng and things being offered up as solutions...IMHO pkgng and optionsng are necessary, but not sufficient, to solve
these are all well and good, but in my opinion more comprehensive
documentation and support in these areas would do more good than pkgng.
our current problems.
Optionsng is nice, but lacking in documentation. Is it too much to ask
port maintainers to write a bit more documentation on the options they
are providing?
Where are you looking? I updated the Porter's Handbook- is there something
missing?
Chris
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD ?
- From: Dave Hayes
- Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD ?
- References:
- Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD ?
- From: Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
- Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD ?
- From: Dave Hayes
- Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD ?
- From: Gary Palmer
- Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD ?
- From: Dave Hayes
- Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD ?
- From: Mark Linimon
- Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD ?
- From: Dave Hayes
- Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD ?
- Prev by Date: Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD?
- Next by Date: Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD ?
- Previous by thread: Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD ?
- Next by thread: Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|