Graphics Performance with the new KMS Driver...
- From: Pierre-Luc Drouin <pldrouin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 14:25:19 -0400
Hi,
I just installed FreeBSD 9-stable on a new desktop machine equipped with an
i3 2120 CPU (HD Graphics 2000). I compiled xorg with WITH_NEW_XORG=true and
WITH_KMS=true, following the instructions on
http://wiki.freebsd.org/Intel_GPU . Xorg seems to be running without
crashing and I have confirmed that direct rendering is enabled using
glxinfo, which is great. However, I only get about 9 fps with GLPlanet and
I can't play (non-HD) Youtube videos fullscreen on a 1080p monitor without
severe noticeable hangs. I was wondering if it is normal to observe this
not so great performance. I could not do a direct comparison on the same
machine unfortunately, but I get a drastically better graphics performance
with GLPlanet from my laptop running Gentoo and equipped with an i7 2860QM
CPU (HD Graphics 3000). I get a frame rate of about 60 fps fullscreen on a
1080p monitor with that laptop.
So basically I would be interested to know:
-Is it normal to obtain that kind of performance from these i3 CPUs when
running FreeBSD?
-How does the graphics performance compare between Linux and FreeBSD with
the new KMS driver?
Thanks!
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Graphics Performance with the new KMS Driver...
- From: Jakub Lach
- Re: Graphics Performance with the new KMS Driver...
- Prev by Date: Re: Build failure xorg-drivers with Clang
- Next by Date: MFC for ZFS fix?
- Previous by thread: 8.2 ->8.3 regression on disk writes
- Next by thread: Re: Graphics Performance with the new KMS Driver...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|