[HPADM] Re: OT: Thoughts on Linux, Future? or not?

From: Deepak John Cutinha (deepak_cutinha_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 07/18/04

  • Next message: Eric Forgette: "[HPADM] Re: OT: Thoughts on Linux, Future? or not?"
    Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2004 03:04:27 -0700 (PDT)
    To: Stephanie Chung <stepchung@yahoo.com>, "Ayson, Alison {Info~Palo Alto}" <alison.ayson@ROCHE.COM>, hpux <hpux-admin@dutchworks.nl>
    
    

    I agree with Alison and Stephanie...

    I am also working with HPUX Solaris & Linux...

    But I feel Linux has a long way to go before
    we call it the best OS available...

    I often hear this term cheaper...

    I never figured out how cheaper..maybe I donot have
    the skills to find that out...

    I am being forced to adopt Linux and the crowd around
    me is all ga ga over Linux...???

    I still want to be loyal to the good world of Solaris
    & HPUX...sad that a tested and trusted OS is being
    sidelined....

    Just my views...

    Deepak Cutinha
    --- Stephanie Chung <stepchung@yahoo.com> wrote:
    > Alison,
    >
    > "Amen!" You really nailed this issue. I don't
    > understand why people are crazy about "Linux". They
    > don't look at the big picture. Linux is not a big
    > deal
    > after all. I work with HPUX, Linux and Solaris. If
    > my
    > boss pushes me to go with Linux on our critical
    > production environment, I will resign before I get
    > fired. Linux security and support are a huge pain in
    > the neck. In my 5 years with HPUX, Linux and
    > Solaris,
    > I got hacked in 36 times on Linux, 14 times on
    > Solaris
    > and ZERO time on HPUX. “Cheap” is not a
    > solution. In the long run, “Cheap” will
    > come back and bite you big time. My comment is
    > “if you have a good and secured system, stick
    > with it. Do not change to Linux.”
    >
    > Stephanie
    >
    > --- "Ayson, Alison {Info~Palo Alto}"
    > <alison.ayson@ROCHE.COM> wrote:
    > > I haven't posted in awhile so I hope "OT" is still
    > > the right symbol for
    > > "Off Topic"
    > >
    > > I've been an HP-UX administrator for over 10 years
    > > (some Solaris and SGI
    > > too, but mostly HP-UX). Lately there has been a
    > big
    > > push within our
    > > company to look at Linux, specifically RedHat (AS
    > > 3.0 and 2.1). It
    > > seems that everyone wants to jump on the Linux
    > > bandwagon, but I'm not
    > > convinced Linux is the all-encompassing solution
    > > that so many seem to
    > > think it is.
    > >
    > > The biggest motivation for moving to Linux is
    > > financial (from the
    > > "higher ups" that is). The hardware is cheaper
    > and
    > > so is the OS.
    > > However, it's been my experience--so far at
    > > least--that what you save in
    > > hardware and software you quickly use up in Sys
    > > Admin time. I have
    > > spent so many hours trying to get a particular
    > > driver to load, or a
    > > piece of "freeware" software to compile; something
    > > that would have taken
    > > minutes on an HP-UX server. And support from
    > RedHat
    > > is a joke! The
    > > quickest response I've gotten so far to a reported
    > > problem was 72 hours
    > > (usually it's 2 weeks, one question has been
    > pending
    > > for 3 months no
    > > with no response). Luckily we bought 1 year of
    > > support from HP for one
    > > of our Linux servers; I can get an answer from HP
    > > fairly quickly. So far
    > > we have very few Linux servers so I haven't gotten
    > > overwhelmed----yet.
    > > However if I had 20 or so linux servers to
    > maintain,
    > > and everytime I had
    > > to make some sort of change to that server I had
    > to
    > > spend hours
    > > recompiling the kernel or whatever...the situation
    > > could quickly become
    > > a nightmare.
    > >
    > > I wondered what some of the other HP Sys Admins
    > out
    > > there think about
    > > Linux? Have your experiences been positive or
    > have
    > > you experienced some
    > > of the same difficulties.
    > >
    > > Thanks for any feedback.
    > >
    > > -- Alison Ayson
    > > Roche Bioscience
    > > Palo Alto, CA
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > __________________________________
    > Do you Yahoo!?
    > Vote for the stars of Yahoo!'s next ad campaign!
    >
    http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/yahoo/votelifeengine/
    >
    >
    > --
    > ---> Please post QUESTIONS and
    > SUMMARIES only!! <---
    > To subscribe/unsubscribe to this list,
    > contact majordomo@dutchworks.nl
    > Name: hpux-admin@dutchworks.nl Owner:
    > owner-hpux-admin@dutchworks.nl
    >
    > Archives:
    > ftp.dutchworks.nl:/pub/digests/hpux-admin
    > (FTP, browse only)
    >
    > http://www.dutchworks.nl/htbin/hpsysadmin (Web,
    > browse & search)
    >
    >

                    
    __________________________________
    Do you Yahoo!?
    Vote for the stars of Yahoo!'s next ad campaign!
    http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/yahoo/votelifeengine/

    --
                 ---> Please post QUESTIONS and SUMMARIES only!! <---
            To subscribe/unsubscribe to this list, contact majordomo@dutchworks.nl
           Name: hpux-admin@dutchworks.nl     Owner: owner-hpux-admin@dutchworks.nl
     
     Archives:  ftp.dutchworks.nl:/pub/digests/hpux-admin       (FTP, browse only)
                http://www.dutchworks.nl/htbin/hpsysadmin   (Web, browse & search)
    

  • Next message: Eric Forgette: "[HPADM] Re: OT: Thoughts on Linux, Future? or not?"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Is anything else then Solaris used on UltraSparc Machines.
      ... > familiar with Solaris. ... The same thing cannot be said for Linux. ... Solaris x86 seems better with more expensive hardware whereas Linux ... it for Solaris (SPARC). ...
      (comp.unix.solaris)
    • Re: Is anything else then Solaris used on UltraSparc Machines.
      ... They are just not there right now, just like Linux isn't there ... scalability, real-time support, standards compliance, volume ... > Sure there is a lot of pre-packaged software of Solaris, ... but it is often more hassle on Solaris (even SPARC). ...
      (comp.unix.solaris)
    • Re: Is anything else then Solaris used on UltraSparc Machines.
      ... > I think there are good reasons for using Linux in place of Solaris ... The same thing cannot be said for Linux. ... Solaris x86 seems better with more expensive hardware whereas Linux ... it for Solaris (SPARC). ...
      (comp.unix.solaris)
    • Re: Linux Advocates Fear Solaris 10.
      ... >> will want, and will get, with Linux and repositories of GPL software. ... Solaris has 95% of Linux ... Okay, so take OUT the Linux compatibility layer, and any of the GPL ... SUN, however, can 'open source' their Solaris, package a shitload of GPL ...
      (comp.unix.solaris)
    • Re: Why is SUN falling so far behind IBM?
      ... > x86 delivery to be later than Linux. ... > communicated from day one that JDS was a solution that ran on ... substantial lead over Solaris in the x86 world. ... > great success with the Sun Rays and Sun Blades running the JDS stack. ...
      (comp.unix.solaris)